The Uncertain Path of Class Action Law

Sergio J. Campos
{"title":"The Uncertain Path of Class Action Law","authors":"Sergio J. Campos","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3124353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the past nine terms the Supreme Court has increased its focus on the law of class actions. In doing so, the Court has revised the law to better accord with a view of the class action as an exception to an idealized picture of litigation. This “exceptional” view of the class action has had a profound impact not only on class action law, but procedural and substantive law in general. However, in the October 2015 term the Court decided three class action cases which support an alternative, “functional” view of the class action, one that does not view the class action as exceptional, but as one of many equally permissible tools to serve the objectives of substantive law. This alternative view has the potential to have a similarly significant impact on the law, but it is not certain whether the Court will further develop this alternative, especially given its most recent class action decisions. This article discusses the development of the “exceptional” view of the class action, the awakening of a “functional” alternative view, and the uncertain path ahead.","PeriodicalId":80891,"journal":{"name":"Cardozo law review","volume":"40 1","pages":"2223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardozo law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3124353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the past nine terms the Supreme Court has increased its focus on the law of class actions. In doing so, the Court has revised the law to better accord with a view of the class action as an exception to an idealized picture of litigation. This “exceptional” view of the class action has had a profound impact not only on class action law, but procedural and substantive law in general. However, in the October 2015 term the Court decided three class action cases which support an alternative, “functional” view of the class action, one that does not view the class action as exceptional, but as one of many equally permissible tools to serve the objectives of substantive law. This alternative view has the potential to have a similarly significant impact on the law, but it is not certain whether the Court will further develop this alternative, especially given its most recent class action decisions. This article discusses the development of the “exceptional” view of the class action, the awakening of a “functional” alternative view, and the uncertain path ahead.
集体诉讼法的不确定性路径
在过去的九届任期中,最高法院更加关注集体诉讼法。在这样做的过程中,最高法院修改了法律,以更好地符合集体诉讼作为理想化诉讼的例外的观点。这种“例外”的集体诉讼观不仅对集体诉讼法产生了深远的影响,而且对整个程序法和实体法也产生了深远影响。然而,在2015年10月的任期内,法院裁定了三起集体诉讼案件,这些案件支持对集体诉讼的另一种“功能性”观点,即不将集体诉讼视为例外,而是将其视为服务于实体法目标的许多同样允许的工具之一。这种替代观点有可能对法律产生类似的重大影响,但不确定法院是否会进一步发展这种替代观点,特别是考虑到其最近的集体诉讼裁决。本文讨论了集体诉讼“例外”观的发展,“功能”替代观的觉醒,以及未来的不确定道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信