The Use of Cohesive Devices in Research Paper Conference to Achieve Texts Coherence

Perwari Melati Akmilia, Abdurrachman Faridi, Zulfa Sakhiyya
{"title":"The Use of Cohesive Devices in Research Paper Conference to Achieve Texts Coherence","authors":"Perwari Melati Akmilia, Abdurrachman Faridi, Zulfa Sakhiyya","doi":"10.15294/eej.v12i1.53228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper employs discourse analysis to investigate cohesive devices and coherence in research articles. The research was based on a purposive random sampling of 10 research articles from the 8th ELTLT Conference 2019. The text analyzed in this paper includes the abstract, introduction, research methodology, findings and discussions, and conclusion. We seek to find out grammatical and lexical cohesion as conceptualized by Halliday and Hasan's (1976) concept, i.e., reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, reiteration, and collocation. Furthermore, we discover the relation among research articles to achieve coherence by employing logical relations that highlight Thornbury's (2005) theory. According to the findings, the authors used cohesive devices in the creation of their writing product. From a total of 1955 clauses in 224 paragraphs, it was determined that almost all types of cohesive devices are used throughout the text. The conjunction of addition was the most frequently used cohesive device in the texts. Our findings demonstrate that authors engage the additional information to create a text without changing the context in the previous clause or sentence. However, there was no evidence of verbal ellipsis in the texts we examined. It was because the authors did not use both lexical verbs and modal operators. In conclusion, a cohesive device binds text together and bridges the gaps to avoid misleading context and achieve text coherence. Further studies need to explore the use of cohesive devices as a tool to improve the quality of writing.","PeriodicalId":30982,"journal":{"name":"English Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.53228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This paper employs discourse analysis to investigate cohesive devices and coherence in research articles. The research was based on a purposive random sampling of 10 research articles from the 8th ELTLT Conference 2019. The text analyzed in this paper includes the abstract, introduction, research methodology, findings and discussions, and conclusion. We seek to find out grammatical and lexical cohesion as conceptualized by Halliday and Hasan's (1976) concept, i.e., reference, substitution, ellipsis, conjunction, reiteration, and collocation. Furthermore, we discover the relation among research articles to achieve coherence by employing logical relations that highlight Thornbury's (2005) theory. According to the findings, the authors used cohesive devices in the creation of their writing product. From a total of 1955 clauses in 224 paragraphs, it was determined that almost all types of cohesive devices are used throughout the text. The conjunction of addition was the most frequently used cohesive device in the texts. Our findings demonstrate that authors engage the additional information to create a text without changing the context in the previous clause or sentence. However, there was no evidence of verbal ellipsis in the texts we examined. It was because the authors did not use both lexical verbs and modal operators. In conclusion, a cohesive device binds text together and bridges the gaps to avoid misleading context and achieve text coherence. Further studies need to explore the use of cohesive devices as a tool to improve the quality of writing.
论文会议中衔接手段的运用以达到语篇连贯
本文运用语篇分析法对研究性文章中的衔接手段和连贯性进行了研究。这项研究基于对2019年第八届ELTLT会议的10篇研究文章的有目的的随机抽样。本文分析的文本包括摘要、引言、研究方法、发现与讨论以及结论。我们试图找出韩礼德和哈桑(1976)概念中的语法和词汇衔接,即指称、替代、省略、连词、重复和搭配。此外,我们发现了研究文章之间的关系,通过使用突出Thornbury(2005)理论的逻辑关系来实现连贯性。根据研究结果,作者在写作产品的创作中使用了衔接手段。从224段共1955个条款中可以确定,几乎所有类型的衔接手段都在全文中使用。附加连词是文本中最常用的衔接手段。我们的研究结果表明,作者在不改变前一个从句或句子的上下文的情况下,利用额外的信息来创建文本。然而,在我们研究的文本中,没有证据表明存在言语省略。这是因为作者没有同时使用词汇动词和语气词。总之,衔接手段将文本结合在一起,弥合差距,以避免误导上下文,实现文本连贯。进一步的研究需要探索使用衔接手段作为提高写作质量的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信