Charging Station Location and Sizing for Electric Vehicles Under Congestion

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Ömer Burak Kinay, Fatma Gzara, Sibel A. Alumur
{"title":"Charging Station Location and Sizing for Electric Vehicles Under Congestion","authors":"Ömer Burak Kinay, Fatma Gzara, Sibel A. Alumur","doi":"10.1287/trsc.2021.0494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the problem of determining the strategic location of charging stations and their capacity levels under stochastic electric vehicle flows and charging times taking into account the route choice response of users. The problem is modeled using bilevel optimization, where the network planner or leader minimizes the total infrastructure cost of locating and sizing charging stations while ensuring a probabilistic service requirement on the waiting time to charge. Electric vehicle users or followers, on the other hand, minimize route length and may be cooperative or noncooperative. Their choice of route in turn determines the charging demand and waiting times at the charging stations and hence, the need to account for their decisions by the leader. The bilevel problem reduces to a single-level mixed-integer model using the optimality conditions of the follower’s problem when the charging stations operate as M/M/c queues and the followers are cooperative. To solve the bilevel model, a decomposition-based solution methodology is developed that uses a new logic-based Benders algorithm for the location-only problem. Computational experiments are performed on benchmark and real-life highway networks, including a new eastern U.S. network. The impact of route choice response, service requirements, and deviation tolerance on the location and sizing decisions are analyzed. The analysis demonstrates that stringent service requirements increase the capacity levels at open charging stations rather than their number and that solutions allowing higher deviations are less costly. Moreover, the difference between solutions under cooperative and uncooperative route choices is more significant when the deviation tolerance is lower. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on 2021 TSL Workshop: Supply and Demand Interplay in Transport and Logistics. Funding: This research was supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship when Ö. B. Kınay was a PhD candidate at the University of Waterloo, and this support is acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.0494 .","PeriodicalId":51202,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.0494","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper studies the problem of determining the strategic location of charging stations and their capacity levels under stochastic electric vehicle flows and charging times taking into account the route choice response of users. The problem is modeled using bilevel optimization, where the network planner or leader minimizes the total infrastructure cost of locating and sizing charging stations while ensuring a probabilistic service requirement on the waiting time to charge. Electric vehicle users or followers, on the other hand, minimize route length and may be cooperative or noncooperative. Their choice of route in turn determines the charging demand and waiting times at the charging stations and hence, the need to account for their decisions by the leader. The bilevel problem reduces to a single-level mixed-integer model using the optimality conditions of the follower’s problem when the charging stations operate as M/M/c queues and the followers are cooperative. To solve the bilevel model, a decomposition-based solution methodology is developed that uses a new logic-based Benders algorithm for the location-only problem. Computational experiments are performed on benchmark and real-life highway networks, including a new eastern U.S. network. The impact of route choice response, service requirements, and deviation tolerance on the location and sizing decisions are analyzed. The analysis demonstrates that stringent service requirements increase the capacity levels at open charging stations rather than their number and that solutions allowing higher deviations are less costly. Moreover, the difference between solutions under cooperative and uncooperative route choices is more significant when the deviation tolerance is lower. History: This paper has been accepted for the Transportation Science Special Issue on 2021 TSL Workshop: Supply and Demand Interplay in Transport and Logistics. Funding: This research was supported by the Ontario Graduate Scholarship when Ö. B. Kınay was a PhD candidate at the University of Waterloo, and this support is acknowledged. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.0494 .
拥堵情况下电动汽车充电站的位置和尺寸
本文研究了在考虑用户路线选择响应的随机电动汽车流量和充电时间下,确定充电站的战略位置及其容量水平的问题。该问题使用双层优化进行建模,其中网络规划者或领导者将定位和确定充电站规模的总基础设施成本降至最低,同时确保充电等待时间的概率服务要求。另一方面,电动汽车用户或追随者会最大限度地缩短路线长度,可能是合作的,也可能是不合作的。他们对路线的选择反过来决定了充电需求和充电站的等待时间,因此,需要由领导者来解释他们的决定。当充电站作为M/M/c队列运行并且跟随器是协作的时,使用跟随器问题的最优性条件,将双层问题简化为单层混合整数模型。为了求解双层模型,开发了一种基于分解的求解方法,该方法对仅定位问题使用了一种新的基于逻辑的Benders算法。计算实验是在基准和真实的高速公路网络上进行的,包括美国东部的一个新网络。分析了路线选择响应、服务要求和偏差容限对位置和尺寸决策的影响。分析表明,严格的服务要求增加了开放式充电站的容量水平,而不是数量,允许更高偏差的解决方案成本更低。此外,当偏差容限较低时,合作和不合作路线选择下的解之间的差异更显著。历史:本文已被《2021 TSL研讨会:运输与物流中的供需互动》运输科学特刊接受。资助:这项研究得到了安大略省研究生奖学金的支持。B.Kınay是滑铁卢大学的博士生,这种支持是公认的。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2021.0494。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Science
Transportation Science 工程技术-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
10.90%
发文量
111
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Science, published quarterly by INFORMS, is the flagship journal of the Transportation Science and Logistics Society of INFORMS. As the foremost scientific journal in the cross-disciplinary operational research field of transportation analysis, Transportation Science publishes high-quality original contributions and surveys on phenomena associated with all modes of transportation, present and prospective, including mainly all levels of planning, design, economic, operational, and social aspects. Transportation Science focuses primarily on fundamental theories, coupled with observational and experimental studies of transportation and logistics phenomena and processes, mathematical models, advanced methodologies and novel applications in transportation and logistics systems analysis, planning and design. The journal covers a broad range of topics that include vehicular and human traffic flow theories, models and their application to traffic operations and management, strategic, tactical, and operational planning of transportation and logistics systems; performance analysis methods and system design and optimization; theories and analysis methods for network and spatial activity interaction, equilibrium and dynamics; economics of transportation system supply and evaluation; methodologies for analysis of transportation user behavior and the demand for transportation and logistics services. Transportation Science is international in scope, with editors from nations around the globe. The editorial board reflects the diverse interdisciplinary interests of the transportation science and logistics community, with members that hold primary affiliations in engineering (civil, industrial, and aeronautical), physics, economics, applied mathematics, and business.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信