A Policy Framework to Support Shared Decision-Making through the Use of Person-Generated Health Data

ACI open Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1736632
C. Petersen, M. Edmunds, D. McGraw, E. Priest, Jeffery R. L. Smith, E. Kemp, H. Campos
{"title":"A Policy Framework to Support Shared Decision-Making through the Use of Person-Generated Health Data","authors":"C. Petersen, M. Edmunds, D. McGraw, E. Priest, Jeffery R. L. Smith, E. Kemp, H. Campos","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1736632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Individuals increasingly want to access, contribute to, and share their personal health information to improve outcomes, such as through shared decision-making (SDM) with their care teams. Health systems' growing capacity to use person-generated health data (PGHD) expands the opportunities for SDM. However, SDM not only lacks organizational and information infrastructure support but also is actively undermined, despite public interest in it. Objectives This work sought to identify challenges to individual–clinician SDM and policy changes needed to mitigate barriers to SDM. Methods Two multi-stakeholder group of consumers, patients, caregivers; health services researchers; and experts in health policy, informatics, social media, and user experience used a consensus process based on Bardach's policy analysis framework to identify barriers to SDM and develop recommendations to reduce these barriers. Results Technical, legal, organizational, cultural, and logistical obstacles make data sharing difficult, thereby undermining use of PGHD and realization of SDM. Stronger privacy, security, and ethical protections, including informed consent; promoting better consumer access to their data; and easier donation of personal data for research are the most crucial policy changes needed to facilitate an environment that supports SDM. Conclusion Data protection policy lags far behind the technical capacity for third parties to share and reuse electronic information without appropriate permissions, while individuals' right to access their own health information is often restricted unnecessarily, poorly understood, and poorly communicated. Sharing of personal information in a private, secure environment in which data are shared only with individuals' knowledge and consent can be achieved through policy changes.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"05 1","pages":"e104 - e115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Individuals increasingly want to access, contribute to, and share their personal health information to improve outcomes, such as through shared decision-making (SDM) with their care teams. Health systems' growing capacity to use person-generated health data (PGHD) expands the opportunities for SDM. However, SDM not only lacks organizational and information infrastructure support but also is actively undermined, despite public interest in it. Objectives This work sought to identify challenges to individual–clinician SDM and policy changes needed to mitigate barriers to SDM. Methods Two multi-stakeholder group of consumers, patients, caregivers; health services researchers; and experts in health policy, informatics, social media, and user experience used a consensus process based on Bardach's policy analysis framework to identify barriers to SDM and develop recommendations to reduce these barriers. Results Technical, legal, organizational, cultural, and logistical obstacles make data sharing difficult, thereby undermining use of PGHD and realization of SDM. Stronger privacy, security, and ethical protections, including informed consent; promoting better consumer access to their data; and easier donation of personal data for research are the most crucial policy changes needed to facilitate an environment that supports SDM. Conclusion Data protection policy lags far behind the technical capacity for third parties to share and reuse electronic information without appropriate permissions, while individuals' right to access their own health information is often restricted unnecessarily, poorly understood, and poorly communicated. Sharing of personal information in a private, secure environment in which data are shared only with individuals' knowledge and consent can be achieved through policy changes.
通过使用个人产生的健康数据支持共同决策的政策框架
摘要背景 个人越来越希望访问、贡献和共享他们的个人健康信息,以改善结果,例如通过与他们的护理团队共享决策(SDM)。卫生系统使用个人生成的健康数据(PGHD)的能力不断增强,为SDM提供了更多机会。然而,SDM不仅缺乏组织和信息基础设施的支持,而且受到了积极的破坏,尽管公众对此感兴趣 这项工作旨在确定个体临床医生SDM面临的挑战,以及缓解SDM障碍所需的政策变化。方法 两个由消费者、患者、护理人员组成的多方利益相关者群体;卫生服务研究人员;卫生政策、信息学、社交媒体和用户体验方面的专家使用基于Bardach政策分析框架的共识过程来确定SDM的障碍,并制定减少这些障碍的建议。后果 技术、法律、组织、文化和后勤障碍使数据共享变得困难,从而破坏PGHD的使用和SDM的实现。加强隐私、安全和道德保护,包括知情同意;促进消费者更好地获取其数据;以及更容易地为研究捐赠个人数据是促进支持SDM的环境所需的最关键的政策变化。结论 数据保护政策远远落后于第三方在没有适当许可的情况下共享和重复使用电子信息的技术能力,而个人访问自己健康信息的权利往往受到不必要的限制、理解不足和沟通不畅。在私人、安全的环境中共享个人信息,只有在个人知情和同意的情况下才能共享数据,这可以通过政策变化来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书