Multiple Mechanical Ventilation: historical review and cost analysis

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yina Faizully Quintero-Gamboa, Carlos Andrés Aguirre-Rodríguez, Aradeisy Ibarra-Picón, Edwin Rua-Ramírez, Edwin Gilberto Medina-Bejarano
{"title":"Multiple Mechanical Ventilation: historical review and cost analysis","authors":"Yina Faizully Quintero-Gamboa, Carlos Andrés Aguirre-Rodríguez, Aradeisy Ibarra-Picón, Edwin Rua-Ramírez, Edwin Gilberto Medina-Bejarano","doi":"10.18273/revuin.v21n1-2022010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In times of crisis in public health where the resources available in the hospital network are scarce and these must be used to the fullest, innovative ideas arise, which allow multiplying the use of existing resources, as artificial mechanical ventilators can be. These can be used in more than one patient, by attaching a device to distribute the mixture of air and oxygen from the ventilator being used simultaneously (multiple mechanical ventilation). This idea, although innovative, has generated controversy among the medical community, as many fear for the safety of their patients, because attaching such devices to the ventilator loses control over the mechanical ventilation variables of each patient and can only maintain general vigilance over the ventilator. These misgivings about the device have led several researchers to take on the task of verifying the reliability of this flow splitter connector. It is for this reason that this article presents a thorough review of the studies carried out on the subject and additionally shows an analysis of comparative costs between the acquisition of a mechanical ventilator and the flow division system.","PeriodicalId":42183,"journal":{"name":"UIS Ingenierias","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UIS Ingenierias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v21n1-2022010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In times of crisis in public health where the resources available in the hospital network are scarce and these must be used to the fullest, innovative ideas arise, which allow multiplying the use of existing resources, as artificial mechanical ventilators can be. These can be used in more than one patient, by attaching a device to distribute the mixture of air and oxygen from the ventilator being used simultaneously (multiple mechanical ventilation). This idea, although innovative, has generated controversy among the medical community, as many fear for the safety of their patients, because attaching such devices to the ventilator loses control over the mechanical ventilation variables of each patient and can only maintain general vigilance over the ventilator. These misgivings about the device have led several researchers to take on the task of verifying the reliability of this flow splitter connector. It is for this reason that this article presents a thorough review of the studies carried out on the subject and additionally shows an analysis of comparative costs between the acquisition of a mechanical ventilator and the flow division system.
多重机械通气:历史回顾与成本分析
在公共卫生危机时期,医院网络中可用的资源稀缺,必须充分利用这些资源,因此出现了创新的想法,可以成倍地利用现有资源,就像人工机械呼吸机一样。这些设备可以用于多个患者,通过连接一个装置来分配同时使用的呼吸机的空气和氧气混合物(多重机械通气)。这个想法虽然具有创新性,但在医学界引起了争议,因为许多人担心患者的安全,因为将这种装置安装在呼吸机上,失去了对每个患者机械通气变量的控制,只能对呼吸机保持一般的警惕。这些对设备的疑虑导致一些研究人员承担了验证这种分流连接器可靠性的任务。正是出于这个原因,本文对有关该主题的研究进行了全面的回顾,并对购买机械呼吸机和分流系统之间的比较成本进行了分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UIS Ingenierias
UIS Ingenierias ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信