The Clerk as Secular Cleric and Griselda as Ecclesiological Type

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Lora Walsh
{"title":"The Clerk as Secular Cleric and Griselda as Ecclesiological Type","authors":"Lora Walsh","doi":"10.1353/sac.2021.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article proposes an ecclesiological reading of Griselda in order to challenge the entrenched view that The Clerk’s Tale “fails” as allegory or “blocks” exegetical signification. Accounting for the most commonly alleged obstacles to the tale’s allegorical effectiveness, this reading incorporates both Walter’s secularity and Griselda’s needless suffering into a historically situated interpretation of Griselda as the late medieval English Church wedded to a secular power that would radically dominate and divest her in the name of reform. The purpose of this reading is not to restore exegetical coherence, but rather to demonstrate that recognition of medieval exegesis as a versatile and institutionally contextualized genre, and experimentation with literary and feminist biblical-analytical methods, can uproot the assumptions that inhibit productive readings of literary and biblical texts in comparable ways. Far from an exercise in neopatristic exegesis, this reading is specific to the medieval intellectual history of a particular exegetical tradition, to the institutional context of the Clerk as an unprosperous secular cleric, and to the agendas of contemporary literary and feminist biblical hermeneuts who resist domineering exegetical acts.","PeriodicalId":53678,"journal":{"name":"Studies in the Age of Chaucer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in the Age of Chaucer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sac.2021.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article proposes an ecclesiological reading of Griselda in order to challenge the entrenched view that The Clerk’s Tale “fails” as allegory or “blocks” exegetical signification. Accounting for the most commonly alleged obstacles to the tale’s allegorical effectiveness, this reading incorporates both Walter’s secularity and Griselda’s needless suffering into a historically situated interpretation of Griselda as the late medieval English Church wedded to a secular power that would radically dominate and divest her in the name of reform. The purpose of this reading is not to restore exegetical coherence, but rather to demonstrate that recognition of medieval exegesis as a versatile and institutionally contextualized genre, and experimentation with literary and feminist biblical-analytical methods, can uproot the assumptions that inhibit productive readings of literary and biblical texts in comparable ways. Far from an exercise in neopatristic exegesis, this reading is specific to the medieval intellectual history of a particular exegetical tradition, to the institutional context of the Clerk as an unprosperous secular cleric, and to the agendas of contemporary literary and feminist biblical hermeneuts who resist domineering exegetical acts.
书记员作为世俗神职人员,格里塞尔达作为教会类型
摘要:本文提出了对格里塞尔达的教会学解读,以挑战《书记官的故事》作为寓言“失败”或“阻碍”训诫意义的根深蒂固的观点。考虑到故事寓言效果最常见的障碍,这本书将沃尔特的世俗性和格里塞尔达不必要的痛苦融入了对格里塞尔达的历史解读中,格里塞尔达是中世纪晚期的英国教会,与一种世俗权力结合在一起,这种权力将以改革的名义从根本上统治和剥夺她。本次阅读的目的不是恢复训诫的连贯性,而是证明承认中世纪训诫是一种多功能的、制度化的语境类型,并尝试文学和女权主义的圣经分析方法,可以根除以类似方式抑制文学和圣经文本的有效阅读的假设。这本书远不是新爱国主义训诫的练习,而是特定于特定训诫传统的中世纪知识史,特定于书记官作为一名不积极的世俗神职人员的制度背景,以及抵制专横训诫行为的当代文学和女权主义圣经先知的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in the Age of Chaucer
Studies in the Age of Chaucer Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信