Insider trading regulation and trader migration

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Robert Merl , Stefan Palan , Dominik Schmidt , Thomas Stöckl
{"title":"Insider trading regulation and trader migration","authors":"Robert Merl ,&nbsp;Stefan Palan ,&nbsp;Dominik Schmidt ,&nbsp;Thomas Stöckl","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Discussions about insider trading regulation veer between the poles of forbidding insider trading to protect market integrity and allowing insider trading to foster informational efficiency. We study traders’ preferences for regulation by offering them concurrent markets with different regulatory regimes in an experimental setting. We find that informed traders’ preference for the unregulated market causes both informed and uninformed traders to be more active in the unregulated market. This market, thus, sees more trading volume, lower spreads, and less mispricing. Nevertheless, uninformed traders suffer greater losses in unregulated markets, while informed traders profit from the absence of regulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 100839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138641812300037X/pdfft?md5=0a547f16c0c54abdad7660685881411c&pid=1-s2.0-S138641812300037X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138641812300037X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Discussions about insider trading regulation veer between the poles of forbidding insider trading to protect market integrity and allowing insider trading to foster informational efficiency. We study traders’ preferences for regulation by offering them concurrent markets with different regulatory regimes in an experimental setting. We find that informed traders’ preference for the unregulated market causes both informed and uninformed traders to be more active in the unregulated market. This market, thus, sees more trading volume, lower spreads, and less mispricing. Nevertheless, uninformed traders suffer greater losses in unregulated markets, while informed traders profit from the absence of regulation.

内幕交易监管与交易员迁移
关于内幕交易监管的讨论在禁止内幕交易以保护市场诚信和允许内幕交易以促进信息效率之间摇摆。我们通过在实验环境中为交易者提供具有不同监管制度的并行市场来研究他们对监管的偏好。我们发现,知情交易者对不受监管市场的偏好导致知情交易者和不知情交易者在不受监管市场中都更加活跃。因此,这个市场的交易量更大,价差更低,错误定价更少。然而,不知情的交易者在不受监管的市场中遭受更大的损失,而知情的交易者则从缺乏监管中获利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Markets
Journal of Financial Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Markets publishes high quality original research on applied and theoretical issues related to securities trading and pricing. Area of coverage includes the analysis and design of trading mechanisms, optimal order placement strategies, the role of information in securities markets, financial intermediation as it relates to securities investments - for example, the structure of brokerage and mutual fund industries, and analyses of short and long run horizon price behaviour. The journal strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical work, and aims to provide prompt and constructive reviews to paper submitters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信