Carl Posy and Ofra Rechter (eds), Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics, vol. 1. The Critical Philosophy and its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. x + 321. ISBN 9781107042902 (hbk) £75.00

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Lisa Shabel
{"title":"Carl Posy and Ofra Rechter (eds), Kant’s Philosophy of Mathematics, vol. 1. The Critical Philosophy and its Roots. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. Pp. x + 321. ISBN 9781107042902 (hbk) £75.00","authors":"Lisa Shabel","doi":"10.1017/S1369415423000031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dyck and others have already pointed out; but if Baumgarten is one of the Pietist critics of Wolffian rationalism, it is also the case that he is not a complete Leibnizian. Nuzzo, for one, is careful to draw attention to the differences between Baumgarten and Leibniz, but for the most part Baumgarten’s departures from Leibniz are less attended to than those from Wolff. That said, this collection does succeed in stripping Baumgarten of the label of a mere ‘member of the Wolffian school’, which has long been appended to him. The picture of Baumgarten that emerges from this collection is of a much more innovative, even lively thinker, in part as a result of his immersion in the competing intellectual traditions of his day. Thus this collection constitutes an important contribution to the ongoing Baumgarten renaissance.","PeriodicalId":54140,"journal":{"name":"Kantian Review","volume":"28 1","pages":"324 - 328"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kantian Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415423000031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dyck and others have already pointed out; but if Baumgarten is one of the Pietist critics of Wolffian rationalism, it is also the case that he is not a complete Leibnizian. Nuzzo, for one, is careful to draw attention to the differences between Baumgarten and Leibniz, but for the most part Baumgarten’s departures from Leibniz are less attended to than those from Wolff. That said, this collection does succeed in stripping Baumgarten of the label of a mere ‘member of the Wolffian school’, which has long been appended to him. The picture of Baumgarten that emerges from this collection is of a much more innovative, even lively thinker, in part as a result of his immersion in the competing intellectual traditions of his day. Thus this collection constitutes an important contribution to the ongoing Baumgarten renaissance.
Carl Posy和Ofra Rechter(编辑),康德数学哲学,第1卷。批判哲学及其根源。剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2020年。第x+321页。ISBN 9781107042902(hbk)75.00英镑
戴克和其他人已经指出;但是,如果鲍姆加滕是沃尔夫理性主义的虔诚派批评家之一,那么他也不是一个完全的莱布尼茨主义者。比如,努佐就小心翼翼地把人们的注意力吸引到鲍姆加滕和莱布尼茨之间的差异上,但在很大程度上,鲍姆加滕与莱布尼茨的差异比沃尔夫的更少受到关注。也就是说,这本合集确实成功地剥去了鲍姆加滕仅仅是“沃尔夫学派成员”的标签,这是长期以来附加在他身上的。从这个合集中浮现出的鲍姆加滕的形象是一个更具创新精神,甚至是活泼的思想家,部分原因是他沉浸在他那个时代竞争激烈的知识传统中。因此,这个系列构成了正在进行的鲍姆加滕复兴的重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kantian Review
Kantian Review PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The journal aims to publish the best contemporary work on Kant and Kantian issues and places an emphasis on those current philosophical debates which reflect a Kantian influence. Almost all recent Western philosophy makes some reference to the work of Kant, either consciously rejecting or consciously endorsing some aspect of that work. In epistemology, in philosophy of mind and language, in moral and political philosophy, and in aesthetics, such Kantian influences are widely acknowledged and extensively discussed. Kant"s work has also increasingly become a concern for the social and political sciences. The journal strengthens this interest both by establishing interpretations of Kant"s own writing and by discussing the substance of the related current philosophical debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信