Voces masculinas en la querella de las mujeres dentro de las academias literarias sicilianas del siglo XVIII: la Apologia filosofico-storica (1737) de Vincenzo di Blasi y La morta viva (1737) de Orlando Libertà y la reinterpretación de la Sagradas Escrituras

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
G. Giacobbe
{"title":"Voces masculinas en la querella de las mujeres dentro de las academias literarias sicilianas del siglo XVIII: la Apologia filosofico-storica (1737) de Vincenzo di Blasi y La morta viva (1737) de Orlando Libertà y la reinterpretación de la Sagradas Escrituras","authors":"G. Giacobbe","doi":"10.24206/lh.v8i3.56321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to outline a first stage of the question on the analysis of the Apologia filosofico-storica (1737) by Vincenzo di Blasi and La morta viva (1737) by Orlando Libertad from the perspective of gender studies, within the context of the Sicilian literary academies of the 18th century. First, a brief introduction is presented in which the first manifestations of what was called \"precursor feminism\" in Sicily are presented. Later, it is mentioned the work Lu vivu mortu (1734) by Luigi Sarmento, considered the anti-feminist work of Sicilian literature and the reactions that this obtained from those writers who positioned themselves in favor of women. Among them, we find Vincenzo di Blasi and Orlando Libertà who, through their works, perform a (re)interpretation of the biblical texts to answer Sarmento’s misogynistic theories.","PeriodicalId":55917,"journal":{"name":"LaborHistorico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LaborHistorico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24206/lh.v8i3.56321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this article is to outline a first stage of the question on the analysis of the Apologia filosofico-storica (1737) by Vincenzo di Blasi and La morta viva (1737) by Orlando Libertad from the perspective of gender studies, within the context of the Sicilian literary academies of the 18th century. First, a brief introduction is presented in which the first manifestations of what was called "precursor feminism" in Sicily are presented. Later, it is mentioned the work Lu vivu mortu (1734) by Luigi Sarmento, considered the anti-feminist work of Sicilian literature and the reactions that this obtained from those writers who positioned themselves in favor of women. Among them, we find Vincenzo di Blasi and Orlando Libertà who, through their works, perform a (re)interpretation of the biblical texts to answer Sarmento’s misogynistic theories.
18世纪西西里文学学院女性争论中的男性声音:文森佐·迪·布拉西的《哲学-历史的道歉》(1737)和奥兰多的《生死》liberta以及对圣经的重新诠释
本文的目的是在18世纪西西里文学学院的背景下,从性别研究的角度对文琴佐·迪·布拉西的《filosofico-storica》(1737)和奥兰多·利伯塔德的《La morta viva》(1737)进行分析,概述问题的第一阶段。首先,简要介绍了所谓的“先驱女权主义”在西西里的最初表现。后来提到了路易吉·萨尔门托的作品《女人活着》(1734),这部作品被认为是西西里文学的反女权主义作品,以及那些把自己定位为支持女性的作家对这部作品的反应。其中,我们发现Vincenzo di Blasi和Orlando libert通过他们的作品,对圣经文本进行了(重新)解释,以回答萨尔门托的厌女理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
LaborHistorico
LaborHistorico LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书