Russia’s Military Invasion of Ukraine in 2022: Aim, Reasons, and Implications

IF 0.1 Q4 Social Sciences
V. Fedorenko, Maksym Fedorenko
{"title":"Russia’s Military Invasion of Ukraine in 2022: Aim, Reasons, and Implications","authors":"V. Fedorenko, Maksym Fedorenko","doi":"10.7206/kp.2080-1084.506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The publication examines the legal nature of wars, looks into the law of war genesis, reviews its conventions, as well as identifies the aim, objectives, causes together with the consequences of Russia’s military aggression on February 24, 2022; it provides a testimony on the war of aggression against Ukraine and identifies its threats to post-war international law and order. The aim of the article is to determine the background, nature, fundamentals and nature of the war the Russian Federation launched on February 24, 2022 against Ukraine within the context of confrontation with the values of Western democracy. Historical-legal dialectical, comparative-legal and system-structural methods, as well as methods of formal logic (induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and concretization, etc.) were used to study the issues. The application of these research methods entails a cross-sectoral scientific nature. Wars have accompanied the entire history of mankind. Since the 17th century the theoretical foundations of the law of war have been laid, which enshrined in international laws and customs of warfare (Geneva Conventions, Hague Convention, etc.) since the 19th century, thus forming the international humanitarian law. After World War II, violations of the latter by the belligerent party are viewed by the world community no less harshly than the mere war. The paper questions the purpose, reasons, conditions and intermediate consequences of the war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Obviously, the military aggression and the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022 marked the beginning of the de facto war, under a specific formal definition by a Russian official as a “special military operation” instead of naming it an attempt to avoid legal responsibility for war crimes committed in Ukraine. The article analyses the aggressive nature of this war on the part of the Russian Federation, demonstrates numerous violations of international law conventions by the Russian armed forces during the military invasion and temporary occupied territories in Ukraine. It emphasizes that the law of war has always been replaced by signing a peace treaty and relevant international agreements, which entails the obligation to severe the political, economic, and legal responsibility of the state violating international humanitarian law. The paper reviews the key institutions and legal tools for bringing the Russian Federation authorities to justice for the war crimes committed in Ukraine. So far, the President of Ukraine, the Supreme Council of Ukraine, and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine have managed to apply legitimate international legal mechanisms, primarily the International Criminal Court and the UN Security Council, to prosecute Russia for violating the international humanitarian law and committing war crimes in Ukraine. At the same time, on the Ukrainian territories currently liberated from the Russian army’s occupation (Bucha, Gostomel, Irpin, etc.), it is already possible to implement a special mechanism of justice, which consists in the collaboration between national and international experts: specialists, investigators, prosecutors, and judges to collect objective and impartial evidence of gross violations of international law and war conventions in Ukraine. It is obvious that for Ukraine today both the victory and just punishment for the committed and continuing committed war crimes on its territory are important. The aftermath of World War II’s “Never Again” now requires, as never before, its effective guarantee and protection","PeriodicalId":36398,"journal":{"name":"Krytyka Prawa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Krytyka Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The publication examines the legal nature of wars, looks into the law of war genesis, reviews its conventions, as well as identifies the aim, objectives, causes together with the consequences of Russia’s military aggression on February 24, 2022; it provides a testimony on the war of aggression against Ukraine and identifies its threats to post-war international law and order. The aim of the article is to determine the background, nature, fundamentals and nature of the war the Russian Federation launched on February 24, 2022 against Ukraine within the context of confrontation with the values of Western democracy. Historical-legal dialectical, comparative-legal and system-structural methods, as well as methods of formal logic (induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, abstraction and concretization, etc.) were used to study the issues. The application of these research methods entails a cross-sectoral scientific nature. Wars have accompanied the entire history of mankind. Since the 17th century the theoretical foundations of the law of war have been laid, which enshrined in international laws and customs of warfare (Geneva Conventions, Hague Convention, etc.) since the 19th century, thus forming the international humanitarian law. After World War II, violations of the latter by the belligerent party are viewed by the world community no less harshly than the mere war. The paper questions the purpose, reasons, conditions and intermediate consequences of the war of the Russian Federation against Ukraine. Obviously, the military aggression and the Russian invasion on February 24, 2022 marked the beginning of the de facto war, under a specific formal definition by a Russian official as a “special military operation” instead of naming it an attempt to avoid legal responsibility for war crimes committed in Ukraine. The article analyses the aggressive nature of this war on the part of the Russian Federation, demonstrates numerous violations of international law conventions by the Russian armed forces during the military invasion and temporary occupied territories in Ukraine. It emphasizes that the law of war has always been replaced by signing a peace treaty and relevant international agreements, which entails the obligation to severe the political, economic, and legal responsibility of the state violating international humanitarian law. The paper reviews the key institutions and legal tools for bringing the Russian Federation authorities to justice for the war crimes committed in Ukraine. So far, the President of Ukraine, the Supreme Council of Ukraine, and the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine have managed to apply legitimate international legal mechanisms, primarily the International Criminal Court and the UN Security Council, to prosecute Russia for violating the international humanitarian law and committing war crimes in Ukraine. At the same time, on the Ukrainian territories currently liberated from the Russian army’s occupation (Bucha, Gostomel, Irpin, etc.), it is already possible to implement a special mechanism of justice, which consists in the collaboration between national and international experts: specialists, investigators, prosecutors, and judges to collect objective and impartial evidence of gross violations of international law and war conventions in Ukraine. It is obvious that for Ukraine today both the victory and just punishment for the committed and continuing committed war crimes on its territory are important. The aftermath of World War II’s “Never Again” now requires, as never before, its effective guarantee and protection
2022年俄罗斯对乌克兰的军事入侵:目的、原因和影响
该出版物审查了战争的法律性质,探讨了战争起源的法律,审查了其公约,并确定了俄罗斯2022年2月24日军事侵略的目的、目标、原因和后果;它提供了对乌克兰侵略战争的证词,并确定了其对战后国际法和秩序的威胁。这篇文章的目的是确定俄罗斯联邦于2022年2月24日在与西方民主价值观对抗的背景下对乌克兰发动的战争的背景、性质、基本面和性质。运用历史法辩证法、比较法和系统结构法,以及形式逻辑法(归纳与演绎法、分析与综合法、抽象与具体化法等)对问题进行研究。这些研究方法的应用具有跨部门的科学性质。战争伴随着整个人类历史。自17世纪以来,战争法的理论基础已经奠定,并载入19世纪以来的国际法和战争惯例(日内瓦公约、海牙公约等),从而形成了国际人道主义法。第二次世界大战后,交战一方对后者的侵犯在国际社会看来并不亚于单纯的战争。该文件质疑俄罗斯联邦对乌克兰战争的目的、原因、条件和中间后果。显然,2022年2月24日的军事侵略和俄罗斯入侵标志着事实上的战争的开始,根据一名俄罗斯官员的具体正式定义,这场战争是“特别军事行动”,而不是试图逃避对在乌克兰犯下的战争罪行的法律责任。文章分析了俄罗斯联邦这场战争的侵略性质,表明俄罗斯武装部队在军事入侵和临时占领乌克兰领土期间多次违反国际法公约。它强调,战争法总是被签署和平条约和相关国际协议所取代,这意味着有义务追究违反国际人道主义法的国家的政治、经济和法律责任。本文件审查了将俄罗斯联邦当局因在乌克兰犯下的战争罪绳之以法的主要机构和法律工具。到目前为止,乌克兰总统、乌克兰最高委员会和乌克兰部长内阁已设法运用合法的国际法律机制,主要是国际刑事法院和联合国安理会,起诉俄罗斯违反国际人道主义法和在乌克兰犯下战争罪。与此同时,在目前从俄罗斯军队占领下解放出来的乌克兰领土上(布查、戈斯托梅尔、伊尔平等),已经有可能实施一个特别的司法机制,该机制包括国家和国际专家之间的合作:专家、调查人员、检察官、,法官收集乌克兰境内严重违反国际法和战争公约的客观公正证据。很明显,对今天的乌克兰来说,胜利和对在其领土上犯下并继续犯下的战争罪行的公正惩罚都很重要。第二次世界大战“永不重演”的后果现在前所未有地需要其有效的保障和保护
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Krytyka Prawa
Krytyka Prawa Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信