Building accountability and client–officer relationships through videoconferencing: Exploring best practices for community corrections

IF 0.8 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Sebastián Galleguillos, C. Schwalbe, Deborah Koetzle
{"title":"Building accountability and client–officer relationships through videoconferencing: Exploring best practices for community corrections","authors":"Sebastián Galleguillos, C. Schwalbe, Deborah Koetzle","doi":"10.1177/20662203231165372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic forced community corrections agencies worldwide to use remote technologies to prevent the spread of the virus. A growing body of the literature suggests that video-conferencing is poised to be a core practice within community correctional settings. However, little is known about the best practice strategies for incorporating videoconferencing into routine supervision. We address this gap by interviewing and conducting focus groups with a sample of community correction officers from the US (N = 16). We identified the presence of the law enforcement—social work dichotomy in remote settings, reflected in challenges and opportunities when holding clients accountable and establishing client–officer relationships. Our findings show that officers relying on evidence-based practices (EBPs) were able to use videoconferencing tools to overcome remote challenges. We suggest that establishing in-person relationships, adapting EBP, and taking care of logistics are critical steps to strengthen remote accountability and client–officer relationships. We conclude by discussing future research areas.","PeriodicalId":44523,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Probation","volume":"15 1","pages":"97 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Probation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203231165372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic forced community corrections agencies worldwide to use remote technologies to prevent the spread of the virus. A growing body of the literature suggests that video-conferencing is poised to be a core practice within community correctional settings. However, little is known about the best practice strategies for incorporating videoconferencing into routine supervision. We address this gap by interviewing and conducting focus groups with a sample of community correction officers from the US (N = 16). We identified the presence of the law enforcement—social work dichotomy in remote settings, reflected in challenges and opportunities when holding clients accountable and establishing client–officer relationships. Our findings show that officers relying on evidence-based practices (EBPs) were able to use videoconferencing tools to overcome remote challenges. We suggest that establishing in-person relationships, adapting EBP, and taking care of logistics are critical steps to strengthen remote accountability and client–officer relationships. We conclude by discussing future research areas.
通过视频会议建立问责制和客户-官员关系:探索社区矫正的最佳做法
新冠肺炎大流行迫使世界各地的社区矫正机构使用远程技术来防止病毒的传播。越来越多的文献表明,视频会议将成为社区矫正环境中的核心实践。然而,人们对将视频会议纳入日常监督的最佳实践策略知之甚少。我们通过采访美国社区矫正官员样本(N=16)并组织焦点小组来解决这一差距。我们发现了执法部门的存在——远程环境中的社会工作二分法,反映在追究客户责任和建立客户-官员关系时的挑战和机遇中。我们的研究结果表明,依靠循证实践(EBP)的官员能够使用视频会议工具来克服远程挑战。我们建议,建立面对面的关系、调整EBP和照顾后勤是加强远程问责和客户-官员关系的关键步骤。最后,我们讨论了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Probation
European Journal of Probation CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信