{"title":"‘An Era Where Racism is Religion’","authors":"D. Hodgkinson","doi":"10.1017/S0021853723000117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In August 1978, Joshua Nkomo, the long-serving leader of the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU), spoke the words of this review’s title in reference to Zimbabwe’s ongoing liberation war at a solidarity conference in Addis Ababa to justify ZAPU’s controversial decision to shoot down a Rhodesian passenger jet. For historians today, when the importance (if not the meaning) of decolonising the academy is so obvious, Nkomo’s statement is important not just as historical rhetoric but because it calls us to re-evaluate how racism shaped the late twentieth-century global order. This is the stated aim of Timothy Scarnecchia’s Race and Diplomacy, an expansive diplomatic history of Zimbabwe’s ‘long’ liberation war, which sets out to show how racial ideological frameworks shaped the highest levels of diplomatic decision-making up to and after Zimbabwe’s independence. To this end, however, Race and Diplomacy is actually a lot less about race than it is about diplomacy, and specifically US and UK diplomacy. As such, Scarnecchia provides a compelling new account of the American and British diplomatic efforts that shaped the end of Zimbabwe’s liberation war and its first years of independence, wherein race played an important but contingent role. Based primarily on UK, US, and South African archives, the book is an impressive example of how to deal with an extraordinarily complex subject. As Scarnecchia shows, diplomacy was a multilayered, constantly changing feature of this war, involving a mind-boggling number of actors: Zimbabwe’s two fractious nationalist movements, the governments of five frontline states who hosted and supported these movements, the white minority Rhodesian regime, internal Black Rhodesian movements, apartheid South Africa, the UK, the US, and Soviet Union, and others, including Cuba and China. Scarnecchia foregrounds how diplomatic initiatives were shaped by these actors’ institutional politics, particularly those of the two nationalist movements, as well as key personalities such as Henry Kissinger, Joshua Nkomo, Robert Mugabe, Ian Smith, and Christopher Soames. Chapters One and Two gallop through the period’s first fifteen years (1960–75), from the moment when Rhodesian decolonisation deviated from other British colonies to the pivotal events of the mid-1970s, when Southern Africa replaced Southeast Asia as a global centre of the Cold War. Rather than hone in on the 1960s diplomatic debates about Rhodesia’s illegal claim to sovereignty, Scarnecchia instead focuses on the diplomatic response to often opaque and deadly nationalist leadership struggles, particularly those within the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU), whose chairman, Herbert Chitepo, was assassinated in 1975. The book becomes much more focused in Chapter Three and Chapter Four, which deal with the diplomatic events following the release of","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853723000117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In August 1978, Joshua Nkomo, the long-serving leader of the Zimbabwe African People’s Union (ZAPU), spoke the words of this review’s title in reference to Zimbabwe’s ongoing liberation war at a solidarity conference in Addis Ababa to justify ZAPU’s controversial decision to shoot down a Rhodesian passenger jet. For historians today, when the importance (if not the meaning) of decolonising the academy is so obvious, Nkomo’s statement is important not just as historical rhetoric but because it calls us to re-evaluate how racism shaped the late twentieth-century global order. This is the stated aim of Timothy Scarnecchia’s Race and Diplomacy, an expansive diplomatic history of Zimbabwe’s ‘long’ liberation war, which sets out to show how racial ideological frameworks shaped the highest levels of diplomatic decision-making up to and after Zimbabwe’s independence. To this end, however, Race and Diplomacy is actually a lot less about race than it is about diplomacy, and specifically US and UK diplomacy. As such, Scarnecchia provides a compelling new account of the American and British diplomatic efforts that shaped the end of Zimbabwe’s liberation war and its first years of independence, wherein race played an important but contingent role. Based primarily on UK, US, and South African archives, the book is an impressive example of how to deal with an extraordinarily complex subject. As Scarnecchia shows, diplomacy was a multilayered, constantly changing feature of this war, involving a mind-boggling number of actors: Zimbabwe’s two fractious nationalist movements, the governments of five frontline states who hosted and supported these movements, the white minority Rhodesian regime, internal Black Rhodesian movements, apartheid South Africa, the UK, the US, and Soviet Union, and others, including Cuba and China. Scarnecchia foregrounds how diplomatic initiatives were shaped by these actors’ institutional politics, particularly those of the two nationalist movements, as well as key personalities such as Henry Kissinger, Joshua Nkomo, Robert Mugabe, Ian Smith, and Christopher Soames. Chapters One and Two gallop through the period’s first fifteen years (1960–75), from the moment when Rhodesian decolonisation deviated from other British colonies to the pivotal events of the mid-1970s, when Southern Africa replaced Southeast Asia as a global centre of the Cold War. Rather than hone in on the 1960s diplomatic debates about Rhodesia’s illegal claim to sovereignty, Scarnecchia instead focuses on the diplomatic response to often opaque and deadly nationalist leadership struggles, particularly those within the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU), whose chairman, Herbert Chitepo, was assassinated in 1975. The book becomes much more focused in Chapter Three and Chapter Four, which deal with the diplomatic events following the release of
1978年8月,长期担任津巴布韦非洲人民联盟(ZAPU)领导人的乔舒亚·恩科莫在亚的斯亚贝巴举行的一次团结会议上谈到了津巴布韦正在进行的解放战争,为ZAPU击落一架罗德西亚客机的争议决定辩护。对于今天的历史学家来说,当学院非殖民化的重要性(如果不是意义的话)如此明显时,恩科莫的声明不仅作为历史修辞很重要,而且因为它要求我们重新评估种族主义是如何塑造20世纪末的全球秩序的。这就是Timothy Scarnecchia的《种族与外交》(Race and Diplomacy)的既定目标,这是一部关于津巴布韦“漫长”解放战争的广泛外交史,旨在展示种族意识形态框架如何影响津巴布韦独立前后的最高级别外交决策。然而,为此,《种族与外交》实际上与其说是种族,不如说是外交,尤其是美国和英国的外交。因此,Scarnecchia对美国和英国的外交努力提供了一个令人信服的新描述,这些外交努力塑造了津巴布韦解放战争的结束及其独立的最初几年,种族在其中发挥了重要但偶然的作用。这本书主要基于英国、美国和南非的档案,是如何处理一个极其复杂的主题的一个令人印象深刻的例子。正如斯卡内奇亚所表明的那样,外交是这场战争的一个多层次、不断变化的特点,涉及的参与者数量之多令人难以置信:津巴布韦的两个脾气暴躁的民族主义运动,主办和支持这些运动的五个前线国家的政府,白人少数民族罗德西亚政权,内部的黑人罗德西亚运动,种族隔离的南非,英国、美国和苏联,以及其他国家,包括古巴和中国。斯卡内奇亚强调了这些行动者的制度政治,特别是两个民族主义运动的制度政治以及亨利·基辛格、约书亚·恩科莫、罗伯特·穆加贝、伊恩·史密斯和克里斯托弗·索姆斯等关键人物是如何塑造外交举措的。第一章和第二章贯穿了这一时期的前十五年(1960-75),从罗德西亚非殖民化偏离其他英国殖民地的那一刻到20世纪70年代中期的关键事件,当时南部非洲取代东南亚成为冷战的全球中心。斯卡内奇亚没有深入研究20世纪60年代关于罗德西亚非法主权主张的外交辩论,而是专注于对经常不透明和致命的民族主义领导斗争的外交回应,特别是津巴布韦非洲民族联盟(ZANU)内部的斗争,该联盟主席赫伯特·奇泰波于1975年遇刺。这本书在第三章和第四章变得更加集中,这两章讲述了
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.