Evaluating sustainability reporting on GRI standards in developing countries: a case of Pakistan

IF 1.3 Q1 LAW
Ismail Khan, Y. Fujimoto, Muhammad Jasim Uddin, M. A. Afridi
{"title":"Evaluating sustainability reporting on GRI standards in developing countries: a case of Pakistan","authors":"Ismail Khan, Y. Fujimoto, Muhammad Jasim Uddin, M. A. Afridi","doi":"10.1108/ijlma-01-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine sustainability reporting through the lens of global reporting initiative (GRI) standards in developing economies, particularly in Pakistan, from the perspective of stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and system theory.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nQualitative and quantitative analyses on economic, social and environmental areas of sustainability reporting based on the GRI standards are applied across 57 organizations listed on the Pakistan stock exchange over the years 2016–2020.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results from the content analysis and descriptive statistics show that overall sustainability reporting increased persistently over time and limited organizations disclose economic, social and environmental sustainability based on GRI standards. Moreover, the result from the two-tailed correlation analysis shows positive relations between economic, social and environmental sustainability reporting.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFollowing the GRI standards, the regulators, government and policymakers need to assess the sustainability reporting based on GRI standards to improve corporate operations' transparency, stakeholder trust and legitimacy. The organizations should move beyond the compliance of regulatory norms and adopt the globally accepted sustainability GRI standards to improve sustainability reporting. The same kind of sustainability reporting is also advised for other countries with similar backgrounds and sustainability challenges.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe integrated sustainability reporting framework based on GRI standards enables the organizations to work as a system of interconnected economic, social and environmental sustainability to resolve the issue of sustainability reporting, ensure the trust of multiple stakeholders and legitimize their business operations in society.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors' knowledge and thorough review of literature, this is the first study that examines the sustainability reporting based on GRI in the developing country of Pakistan to extend the findings of previous studies from conventional sustainability reporting to the globally accepted GRI based sustainability reporting. Using system theory, this study provides an additional contribution to the consideration concerning sustainability reporting based on GRI standards in the context of Pakistan.\n","PeriodicalId":46125,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijlma-01-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine sustainability reporting through the lens of global reporting initiative (GRI) standards in developing economies, particularly in Pakistan, from the perspective of stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and system theory. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative and quantitative analyses on economic, social and environmental areas of sustainability reporting based on the GRI standards are applied across 57 organizations listed on the Pakistan stock exchange over the years 2016–2020. Findings The results from the content analysis and descriptive statistics show that overall sustainability reporting increased persistently over time and limited organizations disclose economic, social and environmental sustainability based on GRI standards. Moreover, the result from the two-tailed correlation analysis shows positive relations between economic, social and environmental sustainability reporting. Research limitations/implications Following the GRI standards, the regulators, government and policymakers need to assess the sustainability reporting based on GRI standards to improve corporate operations' transparency, stakeholder trust and legitimacy. The organizations should move beyond the compliance of regulatory norms and adopt the globally accepted sustainability GRI standards to improve sustainability reporting. The same kind of sustainability reporting is also advised for other countries with similar backgrounds and sustainability challenges. Social implications The integrated sustainability reporting framework based on GRI standards enables the organizations to work as a system of interconnected economic, social and environmental sustainability to resolve the issue of sustainability reporting, ensure the trust of multiple stakeholders and legitimize their business operations in society. Originality/value To the best of the authors' knowledge and thorough review of literature, this is the first study that examines the sustainability reporting based on GRI in the developing country of Pakistan to extend the findings of previous studies from conventional sustainability reporting to the globally accepted GRI based sustainability reporting. Using system theory, this study provides an additional contribution to the consideration concerning sustainability reporting based on GRI standards in the context of Pakistan.
评估发展中国家GRI标准的可持续性报告:以巴基斯坦为例
目的本研究旨在从利益相关者理论、合法性理论和系统理论的角度,通过全球报告倡议(GRI)标准的视角,研究发展中经济体,特别是巴基斯坦的可持续性报告。设计/方法论/方法对经济、,2016年至2020年,基于GRI标准的可持续性报告的社会和环境领域应用于巴基斯坦证券交易所上市的57个组织。内容分析和描述性统计的结果表明,总体可持续性报告随着时间的推移持续增加,有限的组织披露了经济、,基于GRI标准的社会和环境可持续性。此外,双尾相关分析的结果表明,经济、社会和环境可持续性报告之间存在正相关关系。研究局限性/含义遵循GRI标准,监管机构、政府和决策者需要根据GRI标准评估可持续性报告,以提高公司运营的透明度、利益相关者的信任和合法性。各组织应超越监管规范的合规性,采用全球公认的可持续性GRI标准,以改进可持续性报告。对于具有类似背景和可持续性挑战的其他国家,也建议进行同样类型的可持续性报告。社会影响基于GRI标准的综合可持续性报告框架使组织能够作为一个相互关联的经济、社会和环境可持续性系统来解决可持续性报告问题,确保多个利益相关者的信任,并使其在社会中的商业运营合法化。原创性/价值据作者所知和对文献的全面审查,这是第一项在巴基斯坦发展中国家审查基于GRI的可持续性报告的研究,将以往研究的结果从传统的可持续性报道扩展到全球公认的基于GRI可持续性报告。利用系统理论,本研究为巴基斯坦背景下基于GRI标准的可持续性报告的考虑提供了额外的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Law and Management is a leading journal addressing all aspects of regulation and law as they impact on organisational development, operations and leadership. Organisations and their leaders operate in an increasingly complex world of emerging regulation across national and international boundaries. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to acknowledge the dynamics of that environment and provide a platform for articles and contributions to stimulate scholarly debate in the development of law and practice. The International Journal of Law and Management seeks to present the latest research on policy, practice and theoretical perspectives and their impact on the development and leadership of organisations. Contributions of a multi-disciplinary nature are welcome. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: -Employment and industrial law- Corporate governance and social responsibility- Intellectual property- Corporate law and finance- Insolvency- Commercial law and consumer protection- Environmental law- Taxation- Competition law- Regulatory theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信