Validation of Novel Completely Sealed Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Device: SuperNO2VA™ EtCO2 Measurement and Pressure Test Performance

M. Pedro, S. Cataldo
{"title":"Validation of Novel Completely Sealed Nasal Positive Airway Pressure Device: SuperNO2VA™ EtCO2 Measurement and Pressure Test Performance","authors":"M. Pedro, S. Cataldo","doi":"10.4236/ojanes.2020.1010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: SuperNO2VA™ Et Nasal Mask (Vyaire Medical, Inc., United States) is a new nasal mask with an integrated sampling hood to capture exhaled gases and enable accurate measurements of end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). The authors hypothesized that the SuperNO2VA Et design would measure EtCO2 more accurately than a predicate EtCO2 sampling line, the Smart CapnoLine® Plus, Adult/Intermediate CO2 Oral-Nasal Set (Medtronic, United States). Methods: A simulated patient setup enabled comparison of the accuracy of CO2 measurements within the SuperNO2VA Et and a predicate device for eight condition combinations of input CO2; breath rate and tidal volume (VT); and O2 flow rates. These tests were repeated with simulating Nasal Breathing and Oral Breathing. Results: Testing demonstrated that measurements of 1% and 5% input CO2 within the SuperNO2VA Et were accurate for a range of respiratory rates, VT, O2 flows, and CO2 concentrations. CO2 measurement errors were significantly larger for the Oral-Nasal Set compared to the SuperNO2VA Et for both 1% Input CO2 (-0.12%vol vs. -0.01%vol, p = 0.0005) and 5% Input CO2 (-0.93%vol vs. -0.08%vol, p 0.0001). At 5% Input CO2, eight of the 12 trials for the Oral-Nasal Set failed to meet the ISO accuracy specification, while all SuperNO2VA Et measurements met the specification. The accuracy of CO2 measurement within the SuperNO2VA were not different for Oral and Nasal Breathing trials for both CO2 concentration (1%: p = 0.33, 5%: p = 0.064). With the Oral-Nasal Set, CO2 measurements were lower during Oral compared to Nasal Breathing (1%: p = 0.0005, 5%: p = 0.0091). Conclusions: Based on performance outcomes, use of the SuperNO2VA Et offers significantly more accurate measurement of EtCO2 than the predicate EtCO2 sampling line. Measurements of EtCO2 within the SuperNO2VA Et are accurate over a range of CO2, breathing rates, tidal volumes, and O2 flows, as well as for nasal and oral breathing.","PeriodicalId":56551,"journal":{"name":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"麻醉学期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojanes.2020.1010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: SuperNO2VA™ Et Nasal Mask (Vyaire Medical, Inc., United States) is a new nasal mask with an integrated sampling hood to capture exhaled gases and enable accurate measurements of end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2). The authors hypothesized that the SuperNO2VA Et design would measure EtCO2 more accurately than a predicate EtCO2 sampling line, the Smart CapnoLine® Plus, Adult/Intermediate CO2 Oral-Nasal Set (Medtronic, United States). Methods: A simulated patient setup enabled comparison of the accuracy of CO2 measurements within the SuperNO2VA Et and a predicate device for eight condition combinations of input CO2; breath rate and tidal volume (VT); and O2 flow rates. These tests were repeated with simulating Nasal Breathing and Oral Breathing. Results: Testing demonstrated that measurements of 1% and 5% input CO2 within the SuperNO2VA Et were accurate for a range of respiratory rates, VT, O2 flows, and CO2 concentrations. CO2 measurement errors were significantly larger for the Oral-Nasal Set compared to the SuperNO2VA Et for both 1% Input CO2 (-0.12%vol vs. -0.01%vol, p = 0.0005) and 5% Input CO2 (-0.93%vol vs. -0.08%vol, p 0.0001). At 5% Input CO2, eight of the 12 trials for the Oral-Nasal Set failed to meet the ISO accuracy specification, while all SuperNO2VA Et measurements met the specification. The accuracy of CO2 measurement within the SuperNO2VA were not different for Oral and Nasal Breathing trials for both CO2 concentration (1%: p = 0.33, 5%: p = 0.064). With the Oral-Nasal Set, CO2 measurements were lower during Oral compared to Nasal Breathing (1%: p = 0.0005, 5%: p = 0.0091). Conclusions: Based on performance outcomes, use of the SuperNO2VA Et offers significantly more accurate measurement of EtCO2 than the predicate EtCO2 sampling line. Measurements of EtCO2 within the SuperNO2VA Et are accurate over a range of CO2, breathing rates, tidal volumes, and O2 flows, as well as for nasal and oral breathing.
新型全密封鼻气道正压装置的验证:SuperNO2VA™EtCO2测量和压力测试性能
背景:SuperNO2VA™ Et鼻面罩(Vyaire Medical,股份有限公司,美国)是一种新型鼻面罩,带有集成式取样罩,用于捕获呼出气体,并能够精确测量潮末二氧化碳(EtCO2)。作者假设SuperNO2VA Et设计将比同等EtCO2采样线Smart CapnoLine®Plus成人/中级CO2口腔鼻用套装(美敦力,美国)更准确地测量EtCO2。方法:模拟患者设置能够比较SuperNO2VA Et和对照设备中输入CO2的八种条件组合的CO2测量的准确性;呼吸频率和潮气量(VT);以及O2流速。通过模拟鼻腔呼吸和口腔呼吸重复这些测试。结果:测试表明,SuperNO2VA Et内1%和5%输入CO2的测量在呼吸频率、VT、O2流量和CO2浓度范围内是准确的。与SuperNO2VA Et相比,对于1%输入CO2(-0.12%体积对-0.01%体积,p=0.0005)和5%输入CO2(-0.93%体积对-0.08%体积,p=0.0001),口腔鼻用装置的CO2测量误差明显更大。在5%输入CO2的情况下,12项口腔鼻用装置试验中有8项未能达到ISO精度规范,而所有SuperNO2VA Et测量结果均符合规范。对于口腔和鼻腔呼吸试验,SuperNO2VA中CO2测量的准确性在两种CO2浓度下没有差异(1%:p=0.33,5%:p=0.064)。与鼻腔呼吸相比,口腔和鼻腔通气期间的CO2测量值较低(1%:p=0.0005,5%:p.0091)。结论:基于性能结果,SuperNO2VA Et的使用提供了比同类EtCO2采样线更准确的EtCO2测量。SuperNO2VA Et中EtCO2的测量在CO2、呼吸速率、潮气量和O2流量的范围内以及在鼻腔和口腔呼吸中都是准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
371
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信