FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox – new challenges for the financial market. The case of the Slovak Republic

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW
Simona HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA
{"title":"FinTech and Regulatory Sandbox – new challenges for\nthe financial market.\nThe case of the Slovak Republic","authors":"Simona HESEKOVA BOJMIROVA","doi":"10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the issue of emerging regulatory sandboxes and FinTech in\nthe financial markets. The choice of topic is given by i) the topicality of the selected issues\nand dynamic changes in the financial markets, ii) the fact that there is no flat-rate framework\nfor operating the regulatory sandbox and innovation hub and the EU's efforts to establish a\nframework for the operation of the innovation hub and the regulatory sandbox build on a\ncomparative analysis of the steps already taken in Member States' legislation. Based on the\nanalysis of previous scientific studies focused on the issue of regulatory sandboxes, the article\nidentifies summarizing criteria on the basis of which it approaches the analysis of the\noperating of the regulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. The article thus\nreflects on the need for analysis of national approaches to the establishment of the regulatory\nsandbox and complements the range of scientific studies with the lack of analysis of the\nregulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. With this approach, the article\nsupports the possibility of using the method of horizontal comparison of national regulations\nof individual states in setting a transnational approach to FinTech regulations, as well as\ncontributes to further scientific research at the international level.","PeriodicalId":41903,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Tribune-Tribuna Juridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/tbj/2022/12/3.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article deals with the issue of emerging regulatory sandboxes and FinTech in the financial markets. The choice of topic is given by i) the topicality of the selected issues and dynamic changes in the financial markets, ii) the fact that there is no flat-rate framework for operating the regulatory sandbox and innovation hub and the EU's efforts to establish a framework for the operation of the innovation hub and the regulatory sandbox build on a comparative analysis of the steps already taken in Member States' legislation. Based on the analysis of previous scientific studies focused on the issue of regulatory sandboxes, the article identifies summarizing criteria on the basis of which it approaches the analysis of the operating of the regulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. The article thus reflects on the need for analysis of national approaches to the establishment of the regulatory sandbox and complements the range of scientific studies with the lack of analysis of the regulatory sandbox in the conditions of the Slovak Republic. With this approach, the article supports the possibility of using the method of horizontal comparison of national regulations of individual states in setting a transnational approach to FinTech regulations, as well as contributes to further scientific research at the international level.
金融科技与监管沙盒——金融市场面临的新挑战。斯洛伐克共和国的情况
本文讨论了金融市场中新兴监管沙盒和金融科技的问题。主题的选择由i)所选问题的主题性和金融市场的动态变化给出,ii)监管沙盒和创新中心的运营没有统一的框架,欧盟为创新中心和监管沙盒的运营建立框架的努力建立在对成员国立法中已经采取的步骤进行比较分析的基础上。在分析以往关于监管沙盒问题的科学研究的基础上,本文确定了总结标准,并在此基础上分析了斯洛伐克共和国条件下监管沙盒的运作。因此,本文反思了对建立监管沙盒的国家方法进行分析的必要性,并补充了科学研究的范围,因为缺乏对斯洛伐克共和国条件下监管沙盒进行分析。通过这种方法,文章支持在制定金融科技法规的跨国方法时使用个别国家法规的横向比较方法的可能性,并致力于在国际层面上进一步开展科学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信