COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy

IF 0.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
M. V. Baker, Zhiguo Zhao, Shivani M. Murarka, R. Adam, L. Prescott
{"title":"COVID-19 as a Catalyst for Same Day Discharge After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy","authors":"M. V. Baker, Zhiguo Zhao, Shivani M. Murarka, R. Adam, L. Prescott","doi":"10.1089/gyn.2023.0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study quantified the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on same-day discharges for minimally invasive hysterectomy and evaluated the effect on postoperative morbidity and health care use.Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study, from March 2018 to October 2021 at a single institution, included women older than age 18 who had laparoscopic, vaginal, or robotic-assisted hysterectomy by any gynecologic surgeon. Primary outcome was rate of same-day hospital discharge. Secondary measures were length of stay and rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and health care use. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between patients' characteristics and likelihood of same-day discharge.Results: There were 1608 women included, 896 in a prepandemic cohort and 712 in a postpandemic cohort. Surgeon subspecialty rates were similar between groups, but surgical approaches differed, with more laparoscopic procedures in the postpandemic cohort (p = 0.007). Case order and lengths, and concurrent procedures were not different between groups. Postpandemic patients were more likely to be discharged on the same day even after controlling for confounders in a multivariable regression (32% versus 54%, respectively;odds ratio: 2.78;p < 0.001). Rates of 30-day postoperative complications, transfusions, emergency department visits, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality were not significantly different.Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased same-day discharges without increases in 30-day postoperative complications. The data confirmed that same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy was safe for managing hospital constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)","PeriodicalId":44791,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/gyn.2023.0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study quantified the COVID-19 pandemic's impact on same-day discharges for minimally invasive hysterectomy and evaluated the effect on postoperative morbidity and health care use.Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study, from March 2018 to October 2021 at a single institution, included women older than age 18 who had laparoscopic, vaginal, or robotic-assisted hysterectomy by any gynecologic surgeon. Primary outcome was rate of same-day hospital discharge. Secondary measures were length of stay and rates of 30-day postoperative morbidity and health care use. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate associations between patients' characteristics and likelihood of same-day discharge.Results: There were 1608 women included, 896 in a prepandemic cohort and 712 in a postpandemic cohort. Surgeon subspecialty rates were similar between groups, but surgical approaches differed, with more laparoscopic procedures in the postpandemic cohort (p = 0.007). Case order and lengths, and concurrent procedures were not different between groups. Postpandemic patients were more likely to be discharged on the same day even after controlling for confounders in a multivariable regression (32% versus 54%, respectively;odds ratio: 2.78;p < 0.001). Rates of 30-day postoperative complications, transfusions, emergency department visits, readmissions, reoperations, and mortality were not significantly different.Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with increased same-day discharges without increases in 30-day postoperative complications. The data confirmed that same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy was safe for managing hospital constraints caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000)
COVID-19作为微创子宫切除术后当日出院的催化剂
目的:本研究量化了新冠肺炎大流行对微创子宫切除术当天出院的影响,并评估了其对术后发病率和医疗保健使用的影响。材料和方法:这项回顾性队列研究于2018年3月至2021年10月在一家机构进行,包括18岁以上的女性,她们由任何妇科外科医生进行腹腔镜、阴道或机器人辅助子宫切除术。主要结果是当天出院率。次要指标是住院时间、术后30天发病率和医疗保健使用情况。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估患者特征与当天出院可能性之间的相关性。结果:纳入的女性有1608人,896人在疫情前队列,712人在疫情后队列。两组之间的外科医生亚专科率相似,但手术方法不同,在疫情后的队列中腹腔镜手术更多(p=0.007)。病例顺序、长度和同时手术在两组之间没有差异。即使在多变量回归中控制了混杂因素,疫情后患者也更有可能在同一天出院(分别为32%和54%;比值比:2.78;p<0.001)。术后30天并发症、输血、急诊就诊、再次入院、再次手术和死亡率的发生率没有显著差异。结论:新冠肺炎大流行与同期出院增加有关,术后30天并发症没有增加。数据证实,微创子宫切除术后当天出院对于管理新冠肺炎大流行造成的医院限制是安全的。(妇科外科20XX:000)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The central forum for clinical articles dealing with all aspects of operative and office gynecology, including colposcopy, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, laser surgery, conventional surgery, female urology, microsurgery, in vitro fertilization, and infectious diseases. The Official Journal of the Gynecologic Surgery Society, the International Society for Gynecologic Endoscopy, and the British Society for Cervical Pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信