Introduction to the Symposium on Feminist Approaches to International Law Thirty Years on: Still Alienating Oscar?

IF 1.2 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
AJIL Unbound Pub Date : 2022-09-12 DOI:10.1017/aju.2022.43
C. Powell, A. Wing
{"title":"Introduction to the Symposium on Feminist Approaches to International Law Thirty Years on: Still Alienating Oscar?","authors":"C. Powell, A. Wing","doi":"10.1017/aju.2022.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This symposium explores where feminism has traveled and where it has yet to travel in international law since the groundbreaking 1991 article that Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright published in the American Journal of International Law , “ Feminist Approaches to International Law. ” 1 Their article emerged following a “ particularly frustrating conference where female voice was notably absent, ” at which point Charlesworth, Chinkin, and Wright “ retired to a pub and scribbled thoughts on a napkin that ultimately became [their 1991 article]. ” 2 At a subsequent meeting of eminent (mostly male) international law scholars, the three feminist co-authors presented this work, which generated a degree of controversy. Charlesworth humorously alludes to the controversy in Alienating Oscar , referring to Oscar Schachter, the preeminent former AJIL editor-in-chief. 3 In fact, as Charlesworth noted, even while Schachter disagreed with some of the analysis that they had advanced, he was curious and encouraging, as was characteristic of him. 4 central authors examined arrangement typical to examine discipline based on the experience of women. By challenging the system, feminist theory could identify possibilities for of international law. 5 The authors queried “ whether ” 6","PeriodicalId":36818,"journal":{"name":"AJIL Unbound","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJIL Unbound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2022.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This symposium explores where feminism has traveled and where it has yet to travel in international law since the groundbreaking 1991 article that Hilary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright published in the American Journal of International Law , “ Feminist Approaches to International Law. ” 1 Their article emerged following a “ particularly frustrating conference where female voice was notably absent, ” at which point Charlesworth, Chinkin, and Wright “ retired to a pub and scribbled thoughts on a napkin that ultimately became [their 1991 article]. ” 2 At a subsequent meeting of eminent (mostly male) international law scholars, the three feminist co-authors presented this work, which generated a degree of controversy. Charlesworth humorously alludes to the controversy in Alienating Oscar , referring to Oscar Schachter, the preeminent former AJIL editor-in-chief. 3 In fact, as Charlesworth noted, even while Schachter disagreed with some of the analysis that they had advanced, he was curious and encouraging, as was characteristic of him. 4 central authors examined arrangement typical to examine discipline based on the experience of women. By challenging the system, feminist theory could identify possibilities for of international law. 5 The authors queried “ whether ” 6
国际法的女权主义方法研讨会导言:三十年来:还在疏远奥斯卡?
本次研讨会探讨了自希拉里·查尔斯沃斯、克里斯汀·钦金和谢莉·赖特于1991年在《美国国际法杂志》上发表的开创性文章《国际法的女权主义方法》以来,女权主义在国际法中的发展历程和尚待发展的领域。“1他们的文章是在一次“女性声音明显缺席的特别令人沮丧的会议”之后发表的,当时Charlesworth、Chinkin和Wright“退休到一家酒吧,在餐巾纸上潦草地写下了自己的想法,最终成为了[他们1991年的文章]。”2在随后的一次知名(主要是男性)国际法学者会议上,三位女权主义者的合著者发表了这部作品,引起了一定程度的争议。Charlesworth幽默地提到了《疏远奥斯卡》中的争议,他指的是杰出的前AJIL主编Oscar Schachter。3事实上,正如Charlesworth所指出的,尽管Schachter不同意他们提出的一些分析,但他很好奇,也很鼓舞人心,这是他的特点。4位中心作者研究了基于女性经历的典型纪律检查安排。女权主义理论可以通过挑战这一体系来确定国际法的可能性。5提交人质疑“是否”6
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AJIL Unbound
AJIL Unbound Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信