A Comparison of Solubility Among Zinc Oxide Eucalyptus and Zinc Oxide Eugenol: An In Vitro Study

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Dental Hypotheses Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_116_22

H. Zedan, Z. Jafar

{"title":"A Comparison of Solubility Among Zinc Oxide Eucalyptus and Zinc Oxide Eugenol: An In Vitro Study","authors":"H. Zedan, Z. Jafar","doi":"10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_116_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: We aimed to compare solubility between zinc oxide eugenol and zinc oxide eucalyptus. Methods: One hundred and twenty standardized plastic ring molds were constructed and filled with zinc oxide eugenol and zinc oxide eucalyptus. The specimens were allowed to dry for 24 hours and then weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g. Then divided randomly into three groups and immersed in distilled water for 1, 7, and 21 days. Then samples were removed from the solution and allowed to dry for 24 hours. Then they were weighed again, the percentage of weight loss was then determined as solubility. Data analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and the Tukey’s post-hoc test using MedCalc 20.104. Results: Zinc oxide eucalyptus solubility is more than zinc oxide eugenol. All tests of between-subjects effects and within-subjects effects showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The 1st day results showed solubility of not more than 3% following storage in distilled water which meet the requirements of ISO 6876, where both zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) (0.05%) and zinc oxide eucalyptus (0.15%) satisfied these criteria.","PeriodicalId":43354,"journal":{"name":"Dental Hypotheses","volume":"13 1","pages":"142 - 144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_116_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to compare solubility between zinc oxide eugenol and zinc oxide eucalyptus. Methods: One hundred and twenty standardized plastic ring molds were constructed and filled with zinc oxide eugenol and zinc oxide eucalyptus. The specimens were allowed to dry for 24 hours and then weighed to the nearest 0.0001 g. Then divided randomly into three groups and immersed in distilled water for 1, 7, and 21 days. Then samples were removed from the solution and allowed to dry for 24 hours. Then they were weighed again, the percentage of weight loss was then determined as solubility. Data analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA and the Tukey’s post-hoc test using MedCalc 20.104. Results: Zinc oxide eucalyptus solubility is more than zinc oxide eugenol. All tests of between-subjects effects and within-subjects effects showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The 1st day results showed solubility of not more than 3% following storage in distilled water which meet the requirements of ISO 6876, where both zinc oxide-eugenol (ZOE) (0.05%) and zinc oxide eucalyptus (0.15%) satisfied these criteria.

查看原文本刊更多论文

氧化锌桉树和氧化锌丁香酚溶解度的比较:体外研究

简介:我们的目的是比较氧化锌丁香酚和氧化锌桉树的溶解度。方法:制作标准化塑料环模120只，分别填充氧化锌丁香酚和氧化锌桉树。将标本干燥24小时，然后称至最接近的0.0001 g。然后随机分为三组，分别在蒸馏水中浸泡1、7、21天。然后将样品从溶液中取出，晾干24小时。然后再次称重，减重的百分比以溶解度来确定。数据分析采用双向重复测量方差分析和Tukey事后检验，采用MedCalc 20.104。结果:氧化锌桉树溶解度大于氧化锌丁香酚。受试者间效应和受试者内效应的所有检验均显示具有统计学意义的差异(P < 0.001)。结论:第1天的结果表明，在蒸馏水中溶解度不大于3%，符合ISO 6876的要求，其中氧化锌-丁香酚(ZOE)(0.05%)和氧化锌桉叶(0.15%)均符合标准。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊