On the Problem of Lexical Meaning Representation: A Semiotic Aspect

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
H. Onyshchak, Kateryna Nykytchenko, Nataliia Loskutova, Inna Berkeshchuk, Nadiia Horbach, Nataliia Stakhniuk
{"title":"On the Problem of Lexical Meaning Representation: A Semiotic Aspect","authors":"H. Onyshchak, Kateryna Nykytchenko, Nataliia Loskutova, Inna Berkeshchuk, Nadiia Horbach, Nataliia Stakhniuk","doi":"10.18662/rrem/15.3/771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper provides comparative analysis of the seme stocks denoting good in modern English and French. The formalized analysis of lexical semantics integrating both mathematical and purely linguistic methods has been employed to conduct the research. The study shows that each word in question is internally structured and presents an organized hierarchy of lexical meanings.\nThe seme stocks of the nouns denoting good in English and French present hierarchical systems, subdivided into subsets of polyfunctional, semes with the average degree of functionality, and monofunctional. The comparison of the seme stocks under study has shown that they differ in quantitative characteristics more than qualitative ones. The views on good are partially concurrent in the English and French language world pictures. Both cultures associate it with a good-doer, his/her inner world, social rank, acts of favour, courteous attitude to others, spiritual and material values that promote the highest happiness. The distinctive features reveal the socio-pragmatic character of the concept in English and socially conditioned – in French.","PeriodicalId":45328,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/15.3/771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper provides comparative analysis of the seme stocks denoting good in modern English and French. The formalized analysis of lexical semantics integrating both mathematical and purely linguistic methods has been employed to conduct the research. The study shows that each word in question is internally structured and presents an organized hierarchy of lexical meanings. The seme stocks of the nouns denoting good in English and French present hierarchical systems, subdivided into subsets of polyfunctional, semes with the average degree of functionality, and monofunctional. The comparison of the seme stocks under study has shown that they differ in quantitative characteristics more than qualitative ones. The views on good are partially concurrent in the English and French language world pictures. Both cultures associate it with a good-doer, his/her inner world, social rank, acts of favour, courteous attitude to others, spiritual and material values that promote the highest happiness. The distinctive features reveal the socio-pragmatic character of the concept in English and socially conditioned – in French.
从符号学角度谈词汇意义表征问题
本文对现代英语和法语中表示良好的义项进行了比较分析。结合数学方法和纯语言学方法对词汇语义进行形式化分析。研究表明,每个单词都是内部结构的,并呈现出有组织的词汇含义层次。英语和法语中表示良好的名词的义素库存在等级体系,分为多功能义素、具有平均功能度的义素和单功能义素的子集。对所研究的学期股票的比较表明,它们在数量特征上的差异大于质量特征。在英语和法语的世界图景中,对善的看法部分是一致的。这两种文化都将其与行善者、他/她的内心世界、社会地位、偏袒行为、对他人的礼貌态度、促进最高幸福的精神和物质价值观联系在一起。这些独特的特征揭示了这一概念在英语和法语中的社会语用特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala
Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
30.00%
发文量
126
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信