The cross-market efficiency of the Italian derivatives market

IF 3.6 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Izidin El Kalak, R. Hudson
{"title":"The cross-market efficiency of the Italian derivatives market","authors":"Izidin El Kalak, R. Hudson","doi":"10.1108/raf-11-2016-0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the cross-market efficiency of the FTSE/MIB index options contracts traded on the Italian derivatives market (IDEM) during a period including the financial crisis between 1st October 2007 and 31st December 2012 using daily option prices.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTwo fundamental no-arbitrage conditions were tested: the lower boundary condition (LBC) and the put–call parity (PCP) condition while taking into account the role of transaction costs in mitigating the number of violations reported. Ex post tests of LBC and PCP revealed a low incidence of mispricing in this market. Furthermore, to check the robustness of the results obtained by the ex post tests, ex ante tests were applied to PCP violations occurring within a one-day lag.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results showed a significant drop in the number of profitable arbitrage strategies. The findings obtained from all these tests generally support the cross-market efficiency of the Italian index options market during the sample period, though some violations were occasionally reported. Overall, the number and monetary value of the violations reported declined during the post-financial crisis period compared to those during the financial crisis period.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study can be extended to test the relationships between arbitrage profitability and other factors such as the moneyness (in the money, out of the money, at the money) of options and the maturity of options. Options market efficiency tests can be conducted such as call and put spreads, box spreads and put/call convexities (butterfly spreads).\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere are several factors that influenced the decision to test the Italian index options market. First, the limited number of studies conducted on this market. Second, the fact that the two main studies on this market are relatively old, which makes it interesting to test the efficiency of this market with respect to a new set of data, taking into account the introduction of the Euro and the impact of the recent financial crisis on this market and whether the market efficiency hypothesis holds during the period of crisis. Third, it is important to consider the effect of the new rules applied to this market.\n","PeriodicalId":21152,"journal":{"name":"Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/raf-11-2016-0184","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/raf-11-2016-0184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the cross-market efficiency of the FTSE/MIB index options contracts traded on the Italian derivatives market (IDEM) during a period including the financial crisis between 1st October 2007 and 31st December 2012 using daily option prices. Design/methodology/approach Two fundamental no-arbitrage conditions were tested: the lower boundary condition (LBC) and the put–call parity (PCP) condition while taking into account the role of transaction costs in mitigating the number of violations reported. Ex post tests of LBC and PCP revealed a low incidence of mispricing in this market. Furthermore, to check the robustness of the results obtained by the ex post tests, ex ante tests were applied to PCP violations occurring within a one-day lag. Findings The results showed a significant drop in the number of profitable arbitrage strategies. The findings obtained from all these tests generally support the cross-market efficiency of the Italian index options market during the sample period, though some violations were occasionally reported. Overall, the number and monetary value of the violations reported declined during the post-financial crisis period compared to those during the financial crisis period. Research limitations/implications This study can be extended to test the relationships between arbitrage profitability and other factors such as the moneyness (in the money, out of the money, at the money) of options and the maturity of options. Options market efficiency tests can be conducted such as call and put spreads, box spreads and put/call convexities (butterfly spreads). Originality/value There are several factors that influenced the decision to test the Italian index options market. First, the limited number of studies conducted on this market. Second, the fact that the two main studies on this market are relatively old, which makes it interesting to test the efficiency of this market with respect to a new set of data, taking into account the introduction of the Euro and the impact of the recent financial crisis on this market and whether the market efficiency hypothesis holds during the period of crisis. Third, it is important to consider the effect of the new rules applied to this market.
意大利衍生品市场的跨市场效率
目的本研究旨在使用每日期权价格检验2007年10月1日至2012年12月31日金融危机期间在意大利衍生品市场(IDEM)交易的富时/MIB指数期权合约的跨市场效率。设计/方法/方法测试了两个基本的无套利条件:下限条件(LBC)和看跌期权平价(PCP)条件,同时考虑了交易成本在减少报告违规数量方面的作用。LBC和PCP的事后测试显示,该市场的错误定价发生率较低。此外,为了检查事后测试结果的稳健性,对一天内发生的PCP违规行为进行了事前测试。结果显示,盈利套利策略的数量显著下降。从所有这些测试中获得的结果通常支持样本期内意大利指数期权市场的跨市场效率,尽管偶尔会报告一些违规行为。总体而言,与金融危机期间相比,金融危机后期间报告的违规行为的数量和货币价值有所下降。研究局限性/含义这项研究可以扩展到测试套利盈利能力与其他因素之间的关系,如期权的货币性(货币内、货币外、货币内)和期权的到期日。期权市场效率测试可以进行,如看涨和看跌价差、箱差和看跌/看涨凸度(蝶差)。独创性/价值有几个因素影响了测试意大利指数期权市场的决定。首先,对这个市场进行的研究数量有限。其次,关于这个市场的两项主要研究都相对较旧,这使得在考虑到欧元的引入和最近金融危机对这个市场的影响,以及市场效率假说在危机期间是否成立的情况下,用一组新的数据来测试这个市场的效率变得有趣。第三,重要的是要考虑适用于这个市场的新规则的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信