Differences in Learning Outcomes of Islamic Religious Education Using Google Classroom and Conventional Models

Nurlaili Amin
{"title":"Differences in Learning Outcomes of Islamic Religious Education Using Google Classroom and Conventional Models","authors":"Nurlaili Amin","doi":"10.19109/td.v28i1.17289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the study was to determine the differences in PAI learning outcomes using Google classroom and conventional models in grade VII SMPN 8 Kota Bengkulu. The research method used was an quasi experiment with a quantitative approach. The experimental class was given treatment using Google classroom, while the control class still used the previous method, which used the conventional method. The populations were 211 students and the samples were 70 students that consist of two classes. Data collection techniques used tests by giving out pretest and posttest. Data analysis techniques used quantitative descriptive data analysis techniques. The result of the study was that the use of the google classroom model was very satisfactory and classified as a very high category with an average score of 84.34 so it gave positive results. Then, the use of conventional models results are relatively low with an average score of 71.89. This indicates that the conventional learning model was unsatisfactory. Based on the Independent Sample Test obtained by Sig. (2-tailed) values of 0.000 < 0.05, it can be concluded that there was a difference in the average student learning outcomes between those taught by using Google classroom and those taught using the conventional model.","PeriodicalId":31495,"journal":{"name":"Tadib Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tadib Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/td.v28i1.17289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine the differences in PAI learning outcomes using Google classroom and conventional models in grade VII SMPN 8 Kota Bengkulu. The research method used was an quasi experiment with a quantitative approach. The experimental class was given treatment using Google classroom, while the control class still used the previous method, which used the conventional method. The populations were 211 students and the samples were 70 students that consist of two classes. Data collection techniques used tests by giving out pretest and posttest. Data analysis techniques used quantitative descriptive data analysis techniques. The result of the study was that the use of the google classroom model was very satisfactory and classified as a very high category with an average score of 84.34 so it gave positive results. Then, the use of conventional models results are relatively low with an average score of 71.89. This indicates that the conventional learning model was unsatisfactory. Based on the Independent Sample Test obtained by Sig. (2-tailed) values of 0.000 < 0.05, it can be concluded that there was a difference in the average student learning outcomes between those taught by using Google classroom and those taught using the conventional model.
谷歌课堂与传统模式下伊斯兰宗教教育学习效果的差异
本研究的目的是确定使用谷歌课堂和传统模式的七年级学生PAI学习结果的差异。研究方法采用准实验定量方法。实验组采用谷歌教室治疗,对照组仍采用常规方法治疗。总体为211名学生,样本为70名学生,由两个班级组成。数据收集技术通过前测和后测进行测试。数据分析技术采用定量描述性数据分析技术。研究的结果是,谷歌课堂模式的使用非常令人满意,并被列为非常高的类别,平均得分为84.34,因此取得了积极的效果。然后,使用常规模型的结果相对较低,平均得分为71.89。这表明传统的学习模式是不令人满意的。根据独立样本检验,Sig(双尾)值为0.000 < 0.05,可以得出使用谷歌课堂教学的学生与使用常规模型教学的学生在平均学习成果上存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信