¿Un pueblo ignorante de su deber? El ‘estado confesional’ de Inglaterra y las limitaciones estratégicas en la época de Charles I y Oliver Cromwell

IF 0.3 Q2 HISTORY
P. Williams
{"title":"¿Un pueblo ignorante de su deber? El ‘estado confesional’ de Inglaterra y las limitaciones estratégicas en la época de Charles I y Oliver Cromwell","authors":"P. Williams","doi":"10.14201/SHHMO2019411231258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Set in a comparative context alongside Madrid, Paris or Amsterdam, the English crown was certainly extremely short of resources in the first half of the seventeenth-century. Indeed, even after the Restoration (1660) the crown was faced with a financial deficit that placed enormous restrictions on the use of the fleet. There was, therefore, always an enormous contradiction between the projection of a confessional state and the realities of a government whose ability to finance war was highly limited. This perspective has emerged in a revisionism which has questioned the old orthodoxy on the role of parliament and the «puritans». Revisionist historians tend to see Charles I, his confessional programme, deceptions and betrayals as the cause of the Civil War (1642-1646) —often, indeed, as its only cause. Many argue that the real change emerged after 1688, when the political economy of the state was transformed. This vision dovetails with efforts to question, or even abandon, concepts such as the «military revolution», «absolutism» and «mercantilism».","PeriodicalId":42400,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Moderna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/SHHMO2019411231258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Set in a comparative context alongside Madrid, Paris or Amsterdam, the English crown was certainly extremely short of resources in the first half of the seventeenth-century. Indeed, even after the Restoration (1660) the crown was faced with a financial deficit that placed enormous restrictions on the use of the fleet. There was, therefore, always an enormous contradiction between the projection of a confessional state and the realities of a government whose ability to finance war was highly limited. This perspective has emerged in a revisionism which has questioned the old orthodoxy on the role of parliament and the «puritans». Revisionist historians tend to see Charles I, his confessional programme, deceptions and betrayals as the cause of the Civil War (1642-1646) —often, indeed, as its only cause. Many argue that the real change emerged after 1688, when the political economy of the state was transformed. This vision dovetails with efforts to question, or even abandon, concepts such as the «military revolution», «absolutism» and «mercantilism».
一个不知道自己责任的民族?查理一世和奥利弗·克伦威尔时代英国的“忏悔国家”和战略约束
与马德里、巴黎或阿姆斯特丹相比,英国王室在17世纪上半叶肯定极度缺乏资源。事实上,即使在复辟(1660年)之后,王室也面临着财政赤字,这对舰队的使用造成了巨大的限制。因此,在一个忏悔国家的投影和一个为战争提供资金的能力非常有限的政府的现实之间总是存在着巨大的矛盾。这种观点出现在修正主义中,它质疑了关于议会和“清教徒”角色的旧正统观念。修正主义历史学家倾向于将查理一世、他的忏悔计划、欺骗和背叛视为内战(1642-1646)的原因——事实上,这往往是内战的唯一原因。许多人认为,真正的变化出现在1688年之后,当时国家的政治经济发生了转变。这一愿景与质疑甚至放弃“军事革命”、“专制主义”和“重商主义”等概念的努力相吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信