Protest policing strategy and human rights: A study of End SARS protests in Nigeria

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
E. Etim, O. Duke, J. Fatile, Augustine Ugar Akah
{"title":"Protest policing strategy and human rights: A study of End SARS protests in Nigeria","authors":"E. Etim, O. Duke, J. Fatile, Augustine Ugar Akah","doi":"10.1080/10246029.2022.2075708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study, we adopted the negotiation management model (NMM) and the elaborated social identity model (ESIM) to assess and match with global best practices the conduct of personnel of the Nigerian Police Force during the End SARS protest. We used the descriptive mixed-method research design to answer the research questions after taking stock of some achievements recorded by SARS and critical factors that led to the protest. We discovered, among others, that the Nigerian Police Force lacks a functional public complaint mechanism through which members of the society can express their grievances concerning the activities of personnel of the force. Further, the orthodox belief that a dominant show of force would compel protesters to comply with government directives failed during the End SARS protest. Our finding validates H. F. Guggenheim Foundation Guide that the police's response to peaceful gatherings as if they were riots and their failure to prevent a violent development at an early stage would lead to the degeneration of protests. The study makes recommendations on achieving a peaceful and well-managed protest if a demonstration becomes inevitable.","PeriodicalId":44882,"journal":{"name":"African Security Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"226 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2075708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this study, we adopted the negotiation management model (NMM) and the elaborated social identity model (ESIM) to assess and match with global best practices the conduct of personnel of the Nigerian Police Force during the End SARS protest. We used the descriptive mixed-method research design to answer the research questions after taking stock of some achievements recorded by SARS and critical factors that led to the protest. We discovered, among others, that the Nigerian Police Force lacks a functional public complaint mechanism through which members of the society can express their grievances concerning the activities of personnel of the force. Further, the orthodox belief that a dominant show of force would compel protesters to comply with government directives failed during the End SARS protest. Our finding validates H. F. Guggenheim Foundation Guide that the police's response to peaceful gatherings as if they were riots and their failure to prevent a violent development at an early stage would lead to the degeneration of protests. The study makes recommendations on achieving a peaceful and well-managed protest if a demonstration becomes inevitable.
抗议警察策略与人权:对尼日利亚结束非典抗议活动的研究
摘要在本研究中,我们采用了谈判管理模型(NMM)和详细的社会认同模型(ESIM)来评估尼日利亚警察部队人员在结束非典抗议期间的行为,并与全球最佳实践相匹配。在总结了SARS的一些成果和导致抗议的关键因素后,我们采用描述性混合方法研究设计来回答研究问题。我们发现,除其他外,尼日利亚警察部队缺乏一个有效的公众投诉机制,社会成员可以通过该机制表达他们对警察部队人员活动的不满。此外,在“结束非典”抗议活动中,正统的观点认为,占主导地位的武力展示会迫使抗议者遵守政府指令,但这种观点失败了。我们的发现证实了H.F.Guggenheim基金会指南的观点,即警方对和平集会的反应就像骚乱一样,并且未能在早期阻止暴力发展,将导致抗议活动的恶化。该研究提出了在示威不可避免的情况下实现和平和管理良好的抗议的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Security Review
African Security Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信