THE LEGAL ASPECT OF ILLICIT ENRICHMENT IN MALAYSIA: IS IT A CRIME TO BE RICH?

Q3 Social Sciences
Noratikah Muhammad Azman Ng, Z. Ayub, Rohana Abdul Rahman
{"title":"THE LEGAL ASPECT OF ILLICIT ENRICHMENT IN MALAYSIA: IS IT A CRIME TO BE RICH?","authors":"Noratikah Muhammad Azman Ng, Z. Ayub, Rohana Abdul Rahman","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growth of illicit enrichment crime, or living beyond one’s means is a significant challenge in combating corruption. Many countries have shown their commitment towards preventing illicit enrichment crimes by criminalising and penalising illicit enrichment in their laws, including Hong Kong and Singapore. Illicit enrichment is a crime and Malaysia has no clear provisions on illicit enrichment to prevent it. Therefore, this paper analysed the adequacy of Section 36 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694] (MACC Act 2009). The legal framework on illicit enrichment in Hong Kong and Singapore were referred as sources of critique. To achieve the said objective, this study adopted a doctrinal approach using qualitative research methodology. The scope of the paper is limited due to the inadequacy and indirectness of the law on illicit enrichment in Malaysia. This paper critically analysed the international framework of illicit enrichment and conducted a comparative analysis of the law in Hong Kong and Singapore, namely the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, respectively. In conclusion, this paper found that the current law in Malaysia is inadequate and Malaysia can learn to adopt the said laws as provided in Hong Kong and Singapore. This study serves as a guide for legislators intending to address the current inadequacies of the law on corruption in Malaysia, equipped with better knowledge on the characteristics of illicit enrichment. Suggestions to address the issues are proposed.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.2.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The growth of illicit enrichment crime, or living beyond one’s means is a significant challenge in combating corruption. Many countries have shown their commitment towards preventing illicit enrichment crimes by criminalising and penalising illicit enrichment in their laws, including Hong Kong and Singapore. Illicit enrichment is a crime and Malaysia has no clear provisions on illicit enrichment to prevent it. Therefore, this paper analysed the adequacy of Section 36 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 [Act 694] (MACC Act 2009). The legal framework on illicit enrichment in Hong Kong and Singapore were referred as sources of critique. To achieve the said objective, this study adopted a doctrinal approach using qualitative research methodology. The scope of the paper is limited due to the inadequacy and indirectness of the law on illicit enrichment in Malaysia. This paper critically analysed the international framework of illicit enrichment and conducted a comparative analysis of the law in Hong Kong and Singapore, namely the Prevention of Bribery Ordinance and the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, respectively. In conclusion, this paper found that the current law in Malaysia is inadequate and Malaysia can learn to adopt the said laws as provided in Hong Kong and Singapore. This study serves as a guide for legislators intending to address the current inadequacies of the law on corruption in Malaysia, equipped with better knowledge on the characteristics of illicit enrichment. Suggestions to address the issues are proposed.
马来西亚非法敛财的法律层面:发财是犯罪吗?
非法致富犯罪的增长,或入不敷出,是打击腐败的一个重大挑战。包括香港和新加坡在内的许多国家已在其法律中将非法致富定为犯罪并予以惩罚,以此表明它们致力于防止非法致富犯罪。非法致富是一种犯罪,马来西亚对非法致富没有明确的规定来预防。因此,本文分析了《2009年马来西亚反腐败委员会法》第36条【第694号法案】(《2009年反腐败委员会法案》)的充分性。香港和新加坡关于非法致富的法律框架被称为批评的来源。为了实现上述目标,本研究采用了定性研究方法论的方法。由于马来西亚非法致富法的不足和间接性,本文件的范围有限。本文认真分析了非法致富的国际框架,并对香港和新加坡的法律,即《防止贿赂条例》和《1960年防止腐败法》进行了比较分析。最后,本文认为马来西亚现行法律的不足,可以借鉴香港和新加坡的法律。这项研究为立法者提供了指导,他们打算解决马来西亚腐败法目前的不足之处,更好地了解非法致富的特点。提出了解决这些问题的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信