Organisational fragility among urban FNOs in the era of New Public Management

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Deirdre Howard-Wagner, Karen Soldatic, June Riemer, John Leha, Chris Mason, Cheryl Goh, Janet Hunt, Jack Gibson
{"title":"Organisational fragility among urban FNOs in the era of New Public Management","authors":"Deirdre Howard-Wagner,&nbsp;Karen Soldatic,&nbsp;June Riemer,&nbsp;John Leha,&nbsp;Chris Mason,&nbsp;Cheryl Goh,&nbsp;Janet Hunt,&nbsp;Jack Gibson","doi":"10.1002/ajs4.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While Australian governments generally acknowledge that First Nations organisations (FNOs) have better reach into First Nations communities than mainstream not-for-profit (NFP) organisations and governments, as we document in this paper, a survey of community-controlled FNOs in significant urban areas in New South Wales (NSW) suggests that funding and administrative arrangements in the era of New Public Management (NPM) are at odds, and in some instances, actually undermine the effectiveness of FNOs. To explore and gain an explicit insight into the potential tensions in, contradictions with and constraints of NPM on governments supporting and realising the full potential of FNOs in achieving community outcomes, this paper turns its attention to the results of a survey designed by senior position holders from six community-controlled FNOs in the Greater Sydney region and three academics. The survey was designed to examine the relationship of the ability of FNOs to act in the interests of their community members with the normalisation of NPM as policy discourse and practice across all layers of government (Federal, State and Local). Urban areas within the state of NSW as its focus, the core findings from the survey suggest that in the NPM era, urban FNOs face numerous difficulties in realising their community mandates and simultaneously guaranteeing their sustainability for the future. The findings suggest that rather than extending the capacity of FNOs and their reach into their communities, NPM policy structures and mandates create increased administrative burdens, precarity and fragility, as well as decreased organisational autonomy and self-determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":46787,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajs4.243","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajs4.243","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While Australian governments generally acknowledge that First Nations organisations (FNOs) have better reach into First Nations communities than mainstream not-for-profit (NFP) organisations and governments, as we document in this paper, a survey of community-controlled FNOs in significant urban areas in New South Wales (NSW) suggests that funding and administrative arrangements in the era of New Public Management (NPM) are at odds, and in some instances, actually undermine the effectiveness of FNOs. To explore and gain an explicit insight into the potential tensions in, contradictions with and constraints of NPM on governments supporting and realising the full potential of FNOs in achieving community outcomes, this paper turns its attention to the results of a survey designed by senior position holders from six community-controlled FNOs in the Greater Sydney region and three academics. The survey was designed to examine the relationship of the ability of FNOs to act in the interests of their community members with the normalisation of NPM as policy discourse and practice across all layers of government (Federal, State and Local). Urban areas within the state of NSW as its focus, the core findings from the survey suggest that in the NPM era, urban FNOs face numerous difficulties in realising their community mandates and simultaneously guaranteeing their sustainability for the future. The findings suggest that rather than extending the capacity of FNOs and their reach into their communities, NPM policy structures and mandates create increased administrative burdens, precarity and fragility, as well as decreased organisational autonomy and self-determination.

Abstract Image

新公共管理时代城市FNO的组织脆弱性
虽然澳大利亚政府普遍承认,第一民族组织(FNOs)比主流非营利组织和政府更能深入到第一民族社区,但正如我们在本文中所记录的那样,对新南威尔士州(NSW)重要城市地区社区控制的FNOs的调查表明,新公共管理(NPM)时代的资金和行政安排是不一致的,在某些情况下,实际上会削弱fno的有效性。为了探索和明确了解NPM对政府支持和实现fno在实现社区成果方面的全部潜力的潜在紧张关系,矛盾和约束,本文将注意力转向大悉尼地区六个社区控制的fno的高级职位持有人和三位学者设计的调查结果。该调查旨在研究fno为其社区成员利益行事的能力与NPM作为各级政府(联邦、州和地方)的政策话语和实践的正常化之间的关系。以新南威尔士州的城市地区为重点,调查的核心结果表明,在NPM时代,城市fno在实现其社区任务并同时保证其未来的可持续性方面面临许多困难。研究结果表明,国家预防机制的政策结构和授权非但没有扩大外国非政府组织的能力及其对社区的影响,反而增加了行政负担、不稳定性和脆弱性,并降低了组织的自主权和自决权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信