The Audience Experience of Colonial Cinema

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY
J. MacArthur
{"title":"The Audience Experience of Colonial Cinema","authors":"J. MacArthur","doi":"10.1017/S0021853723000129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"and global oncology. It is instructive for grounding theories of responsive health systems in cancer management. Mika’s plea for the incorporation of East African expertise in the historiography of biomedicine and cancer patient care is necessary and timely. Mika convincingly presents the social aspects of care, which may be a missing link in the pursuit of quality cancer care in East Africa and beyond; citing, for example, the UCI’s relative success in pediatric lymphoma research and care services, even amidst the disruptions of Idi Amin’s regime, due to the remarkable consistency and sustained patient follow-up facilitated by the staff’s cultural expertise. The implications for institutional policy and decisionmaking when it comes to local practices of oncology are self-evident. Similarly, the book effectively illustrates how linkages of local health systems to global (international) systems, through corporate and state actors defines — and limits — health justice. Mika is correct to note how access to expensive state-of-the-art cancer diagnosis and treatment technology and expertise helps to define the unequal global health system. Mika argues that ‘global oncology’must be a humanitarian exercise that mitigates economic injustice and inequalities in prevention, treatment, and palliation of cancers (141). The language and presentation of the book are accessible for diverse audiences interested in medical history, African history, the historiography of biomedicine in Africa, and global health. Mika offers an important contribution to health systems research and the emerging fields of anthropologies of cancer and medical and health humanities, by linking social science research and the history of medicine. Health policy makers, those interested in cancer care in the Global South, and researchers in science technology studies will also find the book informative. It presents the lived experience of suffering due to cancer and coping with the disease with sufficient consideration of cultural norms. It adequately balances ethical neutrality while safeguarding against ethical indifference, and draws on essential clinical knowledge to present a comprehensive description of realities in the emergent cancer epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. The book is a captivating resource for interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary researchers and health care providers, and is enlightening reading for anyone interested in the history of medicine and global health justice.","PeriodicalId":47244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of African History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of African History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853723000129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

and global oncology. It is instructive for grounding theories of responsive health systems in cancer management. Mika’s plea for the incorporation of East African expertise in the historiography of biomedicine and cancer patient care is necessary and timely. Mika convincingly presents the social aspects of care, which may be a missing link in the pursuit of quality cancer care in East Africa and beyond; citing, for example, the UCI’s relative success in pediatric lymphoma research and care services, even amidst the disruptions of Idi Amin’s regime, due to the remarkable consistency and sustained patient follow-up facilitated by the staff’s cultural expertise. The implications for institutional policy and decisionmaking when it comes to local practices of oncology are self-evident. Similarly, the book effectively illustrates how linkages of local health systems to global (international) systems, through corporate and state actors defines — and limits — health justice. Mika is correct to note how access to expensive state-of-the-art cancer diagnosis and treatment technology and expertise helps to define the unequal global health system. Mika argues that ‘global oncology’must be a humanitarian exercise that mitigates economic injustice and inequalities in prevention, treatment, and palliation of cancers (141). The language and presentation of the book are accessible for diverse audiences interested in medical history, African history, the historiography of biomedicine in Africa, and global health. Mika offers an important contribution to health systems research and the emerging fields of anthropologies of cancer and medical and health humanities, by linking social science research and the history of medicine. Health policy makers, those interested in cancer care in the Global South, and researchers in science technology studies will also find the book informative. It presents the lived experience of suffering due to cancer and coping with the disease with sufficient consideration of cultural norms. It adequately balances ethical neutrality while safeguarding against ethical indifference, and draws on essential clinical knowledge to present a comprehensive description of realities in the emergent cancer epidemic in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. The book is a captivating resource for interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary researchers and health care providers, and is enlightening reading for anyone interested in the history of medicine and global health justice.
殖民地电影的观众体验
以及全球肿瘤学。这对癌症管理中响应性卫生系统理论的建立具有指导意义。米卡呼吁将东非的专业知识纳入生物医学和癌症患者护理的史学是必要和及时的。米卡令人信服地介绍了护理的社会方面,这可能是东非及其他地区追求高质量癌症护理的一个缺失环节;例如,UCI在儿科淋巴瘤研究和护理服务方面取得了相对成功,即使在Idi Amin政权受到破坏的情况下,这也是由于工作人员的文化专业知识促进了显著的一致性和持续的患者随访。当涉及到肿瘤学的地方实践时,对机构政策和决策的影响是不言而喻的。同样,这本书有效地说明了地方卫生系统与全球(国际)系统之间的联系是如何通过企业和国家行为者定义和限制卫生正义的。米卡正确地指出,获得昂贵的最先进的癌症诊断和治疗技术和专业知识有助于定义不平等的全球卫生系统。米卡认为,“全球肿瘤学”必须是一项人道主义活动,以缓解经济不公正和癌症预防、治疗和缓解方面的不平等(141)。对医学史、非洲史、非洲生物医学史学和全球健康感兴趣的不同读者都可以阅读这本书的语言和介绍。米卡通过将社会科学研究与医学史联系起来,为卫生系统研究以及癌症人类学和医学与健康人文学科的新兴领域做出了重要贡献。卫生政策制定者、对全球南方癌症护理感兴趣的人以及科学技术研究的研究人员也会发现这本书内容丰富。它介绍了癌症带来的痛苦和在充分考虑文化规范的情况下应对疾病的生活经历。它充分平衡了道德中立性,同时防止道德冷漠,并利用基本的临床知识,全面描述了撒哈拉以南非洲及其他地区新出现的癌症流行的现实。这本书对跨学科和多学科的研究人员和医疗保健提供者来说是一本引人入胜的资源,对任何对医学史和全球健康正义感兴趣的人来说都是一本有启发性的读物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
18.20%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of African History publishes articles and book reviews ranging widely over the African past, from the late Stone Age to the present. In recent years increasing prominence has been given to economic, cultural and social history and several articles have explored themes which are also of growing interest to historians of other regions such as: gender roles, demography, health and hygiene, propaganda, legal ideology, labour histories, nationalism and resistance, environmental history, the construction of ethnicity, slavery and the slave trade, and photographs as historical sources. Contributions dealing with pre-colonial historical relationships between Africa and the African diaspora are especially welcome, as are historical approaches to the post-colonial period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信