Split-ventilation for more than one patient, can it be done? Yes

Ehab Daoud, Jewelyn Cabigan, G. Kaneshiro, Kimiyo H. Yamasaki
{"title":"Split-ventilation for more than one patient, can it be done? Yes","authors":"Ehab Daoud, Jewelyn Cabigan, G. Kaneshiro, Kimiyo H. Yamasaki","doi":"10.53097/JMV.10002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 pandemic crisis has led to an international shortage of mechanical ventilation. Due to this shortfall, the surge of increasing number of patients to limited resources of mechanical ventilators has reinvigorated the interest in the concept of split ventilation or co-ventilation (ventilating more than one patient with the same ventilator). However, major medical societies have condemned the concept in a joint statement for multiple reasons. Materials and Methods: In this paper, we will describe the history of the concept, what is trending in the literature about it and along our modification to ventilate two patients with one ventilator. We will describe how to overcome such concerns regarding cross contamination, re-breathing, safely adjusting the settings for tidal volume and positive end expiratory pressure to each patient and how to safely monitor each patient. Main results: Our experimental setup shows that we can safely ventilate two patients using one ventilator. Conclusion: The concept of ventilating more than one patient with a single ventilator is feasible especially in crisis situations. However, we caution that it has to be done under careful monitoring with expertise in mechanical ventilation. More research and investment are crucially needed in this current pandemic crisis.","PeriodicalId":73813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mechanical ventilation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53097/JMV.10002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic crisis has led to an international shortage of mechanical ventilation. Due to this shortfall, the surge of increasing number of patients to limited resources of mechanical ventilators has reinvigorated the interest in the concept of split ventilation or co-ventilation (ventilating more than one patient with the same ventilator). However, major medical societies have condemned the concept in a joint statement for multiple reasons. Materials and Methods: In this paper, we will describe the history of the concept, what is trending in the literature about it and along our modification to ventilate two patients with one ventilator. We will describe how to overcome such concerns regarding cross contamination, re-breathing, safely adjusting the settings for tidal volume and positive end expiratory pressure to each patient and how to safely monitor each patient. Main results: Our experimental setup shows that we can safely ventilate two patients using one ventilator. Conclusion: The concept of ventilating more than one patient with a single ventilator is feasible especially in crisis situations. However, we caution that it has to be done under careful monitoring with expertise in mechanical ventilation. More research and investment are crucially needed in this current pandemic crisis.
对不止一个病人进行分离通气,可以吗?是的
背景:新冠肺炎大流行危机导致国际机械通气短缺。由于这一不足,越来越多的患者在有限的机械呼吸机资源下激增,重新激发了人们对分离通气或共通气概念的兴趣(用同一呼吸机对多名患者进行通气)。然而,主要医学协会在一份联合声明中出于多种原因谴责了这一概念。材料和方法:在本文中,我们将描述这一概念的历史,关于它的文献趋势以及我们对两名患者使用一个呼吸机进行通气的改进。我们将介绍如何克服交叉污染、再呼吸、安全地调整每位患者的潮气量和呼气末正压设置以及如何安全地监测每位患者。主要结果:我们的实验装置表明,我们可以安全地使用一个呼吸机对两个病人进行呼吸。结论:使用单一呼吸机对多名患者进行呼吸通气的概念是可行的,特别是在危重情况下。然而,我们警告说,必须在机械通气专业人员的仔细监测下进行。在当前的大流行危机中,迫切需要更多的研究和投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信