Comparison of Effectiveness of FRIENDS Program, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, and Aerobic Exercise on Students’ Psychological Well-being

Alireza Arkian, M. Jadidi, Zainab Mihandost
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness of FRIENDS Program, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, and Aerobic Exercise on Students’ Psychological Well-being","authors":"Alireza Arkian, M. Jadidi, Zainab Mihandost","doi":"10.30476/INTJSH.2021.89057.1120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Psychoeducation and performing physical activity are believed to be the major duties of academic settings; these might have crucial roles in improving psychological condition of students. The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of FRIENDS psychoeducation, solution-focused brief counseling, and aerobic exercise on students’ psychological well-being. FRIENDS is acronym of Feeling, Remember to relax, Inner helpful thoughts, Explore solutions, Now reward yourself, Do it every day, and Smile and stay calm. Method: The present study was quasi-experimental research with pre-test and post-test follow-up stages and control groups in terms of implementation. The statistical population of this research included all 13 to 15-year-old male students at the first grade of Model State High School in Kahrizak Education District, Tehran, Iran during academic year of 2019- 2020. Forty students were selected as our sample with non-convenience sampling method utilizing G*Power software. The subjects were assigned randomly into four intervention groups. All the subjects administered Ryff Scale Psychological Wellbeing–Short Form (RSPWB-SF) as the research instrument and consent form. Results: Statistical analysis of the obtained data via ANCOVA showed a significant difference between the intervention groups in terms of personal growth subscale in the pre-test and follow-up stages (P=0/01); post hoc comparisons indicated that Solution-Focused Brief Therapy was more effective than other interventions. Moreover, ANCOVA indicated a significant difference between the intervention groups concerning self-acceptance subscale in the pre-test, post-test (p <0.001), and pretest-follow-up (p <0.001) stages; post hoc comparisons revealed that FRIENDS was more effective than aerobic intervention in both post-test and follow-up stages. Conclusion: Students could benefit from psychoeducation programs along with other regular tasks in academic settings in order to improve their psychological well-being.","PeriodicalId":33610,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of School Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"72-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30476/INTJSH.2021.89057.1120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychoeducation and performing physical activity are believed to be the major duties of academic settings; these might have crucial roles in improving psychological condition of students. The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of FRIENDS psychoeducation, solution-focused brief counseling, and aerobic exercise on students’ psychological well-being. FRIENDS is acronym of Feeling, Remember to relax, Inner helpful thoughts, Explore solutions, Now reward yourself, Do it every day, and Smile and stay calm. Method: The present study was quasi-experimental research with pre-test and post-test follow-up stages and control groups in terms of implementation. The statistical population of this research included all 13 to 15-year-old male students at the first grade of Model State High School in Kahrizak Education District, Tehran, Iran during academic year of 2019- 2020. Forty students were selected as our sample with non-convenience sampling method utilizing G*Power software. The subjects were assigned randomly into four intervention groups. All the subjects administered Ryff Scale Psychological Wellbeing–Short Form (RSPWB-SF) as the research instrument and consent form. Results: Statistical analysis of the obtained data via ANCOVA showed a significant difference between the intervention groups in terms of personal growth subscale in the pre-test and follow-up stages (P=0/01); post hoc comparisons indicated that Solution-Focused Brief Therapy was more effective than other interventions. Moreover, ANCOVA indicated a significant difference between the intervention groups concerning self-acceptance subscale in the pre-test, post-test (p <0.001), and pretest-follow-up (p <0.001) stages; post hoc comparisons revealed that FRIENDS was more effective than aerobic intervention in both post-test and follow-up stages. Conclusion: Students could benefit from psychoeducation programs along with other regular tasks in academic settings in order to improve their psychological well-being.
FRIENDS计划、解决焦点简短疗法和有氧运动对学生心理健康的效果比较
背景:心理教育和进行体育活动被认为是学术环境的主要职责;这些可能对改善学生的心理状况起到至关重要的作用。本研究旨在比较朋友心理教育、以解决方案为重点的简短咨询和有氧运动对学生心理健康的影响。FRIENDS是Feeling的缩写,Remember to relation,Inner helping things,Explore solutions,Now奖励自己,Do it every day,and Smile and保持冷静。方法:本研究为准实验研究,包括测试前和测试后的随访阶段以及实施方面的对照组。这项研究的统计人群包括2019至2020学年伊朗德黑兰Kahrizak教育区模范州立高中一年级的所有13至15岁男生。利用G*Power软件,采用非方便抽样方法抽取40名学生作为样本。受试者被随机分为四个干预组。结果:通过ANCOVA对获得的数据进行统计分析,发现干预组在测试前和随访阶段的个人成长分量表方面存在显著差异(P=0.01);事后比较表明,以解决方案为中心的简短治疗比其他干预措施更有效。此外,ANCOVA表明,干预组在测试前、测试后(p<0.001)和测试前随访(p<001)阶段的自我接受分量表方面存在显著差异;事后比较显示,在测试后和随访阶段,FRIENDS比有氧干预更有效。结论:学生可以从心理教育项目和其他常规任务中受益,以提高他们的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信