Book Review: Communicatio Idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Nathaniel Porter
{"title":"Book Review: Communicatio Idiomatum: Reformation Christological Debates","authors":"Nathaniel Porter","doi":"10.1177/00211400221107418e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"wants to pull Protestant theology out of the abyss of excessive subjectivity, personal (often over-emotional) ‘spirituality,’ individualism, and self-obsession into which, according to him, Reformed spirituality and Pietism have led it. His book is very relevant. It is a much-needed tract aimed at an Evangelical tendency to forget the objectivity of the Gospel of grace (perfectly exemplified for him by Luther’s hyper-realistic Eucharistic theology and sacramental notion of the objectivity of Christ’s presence through the word proffered in preaching). It is not so different from Barth’s argument with Schleiermacher but is even more timely in a world increasingly dominated by tele-evangelists, mega-churches, privatized salvation, and self-obsessive spirituality. A massive dose of Luther-objectivity is more necessary than ever: but it seems unfortunate to me to do it by presenting a reductionist version of Augustine’s subtle, delicate, nuanced theology, in which the inner and outer, the social and individual, and the absolute enduring centrality of the incarnate Christ are always paramount. It is a splendid treatment of Luther, but its account of Augustine, fascinating as it is, must be read with some degree of caution.","PeriodicalId":55939,"journal":{"name":"Irish Theological Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Theological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00211400221107418e","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

wants to pull Protestant theology out of the abyss of excessive subjectivity, personal (often over-emotional) ‘spirituality,’ individualism, and self-obsession into which, according to him, Reformed spirituality and Pietism have led it. His book is very relevant. It is a much-needed tract aimed at an Evangelical tendency to forget the objectivity of the Gospel of grace (perfectly exemplified for him by Luther’s hyper-realistic Eucharistic theology and sacramental notion of the objectivity of Christ’s presence through the word proffered in preaching). It is not so different from Barth’s argument with Schleiermacher but is even more timely in a world increasingly dominated by tele-evangelists, mega-churches, privatized salvation, and self-obsessive spirituality. A massive dose of Luther-objectivity is more necessary than ever: but it seems unfortunate to me to do it by presenting a reductionist version of Augustine’s subtle, delicate, nuanced theology, in which the inner and outer, the social and individual, and the absolute enduring centrality of the incarnate Christ are always paramount. It is a splendid treatment of Luther, but its account of Augustine, fascinating as it is, must be read with some degree of caution.
书评:通讯惯用法:改革基督论辩论
他想把新教神学从过度主观性、个人(通常是过度情绪化)的“灵性”、个人主义和自我痴迷的深渊中拉出来,据他说,改革宗的灵性和虔诚派已经把新教神学带入了这些深渊。他的书很切题。这是一本非常需要的小册子,针对的是一种福音派倾向,即忘记恩典福音的客观性(对他来说,路德的超现实主义圣餐神学和通过讲道提供的话语来体现基督存在的客观性的圣礼概念是完美的例子)。这与巴特与施莱尔马赫的观点并没有太大的不同,但在一个日益被远程布道者、巨型教堂、私有化救赎和自我痴迷的灵性所主导的世界里,这一观点更为及时。现在比以往任何时候都更需要大量的路德式客观性:但对我来说,通过呈现奥古斯丁微妙、细腻、微妙的神学的还原主义版本来做到这一点似乎是不幸的,在奥古斯丁的神学中,内在和外在,社会和个人,以及化身基督的绝对持久的中心地位总是至高无上的。这是对路德的精彩论述,但它对奥古斯丁的描述,虽然很吸引人,但必须在一定程度上谨慎阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信