Optimizing the Care of Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients With Advanced Gynecologic Cancer

Q1 Nursing
Y. C. Lee, N. Jivraj, Lisa Wang, T. Chawla, J. Lau, J. Croke, J. Allard, T. Stuart-McEwan, Kashish Nathwani, V. Bowering, K. Karakasis, C. O'brien, E. Shlomovitz, S. Ferguson, S. Buchanan, P. Ng, S. Cyriac, L. Tinker, N. Dhani, A. Oza, S. Lheureux
{"title":"Optimizing the Care of Malignant Bowel Obstruction in Patients With Advanced Gynecologic Cancer","authors":"Y. C. Lee, N. Jivraj, Lisa Wang, T. Chawla, J. Lau, J. Croke, J. Allard, T. Stuart-McEwan, Kashish Nathwani, V. Bowering, K. Karakasis, C. O'brien, E. Shlomovitz, S. Ferguson, S. Buchanan, P. Ng, S. Cyriac, L. Tinker, N. Dhani, A. Oza, S. Lheureux","doi":"10.1200/JOP.18.00793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common and distressing complication in women with advanced gynecologic cancer. A pilot, interprofessional MBO program was launched in 2016 at a large Canadian tertiary cancer center to integrate these patients’ complex care needs across multiple disciplines and support women with MBO. METHOD: Retrospective analysis to evaluate the outcomes of women with advanced gynecologic cancer who were admitted to hospital because of MBO, before (2014 to 2016: baseline group) and after (2016 to 2018) implementation of the MBO program. RESULTS: Of the 169 women evaluated, 106 and 63 were in the baseline group and MBO program group, respectively. Most had ovarian cancer (n = 124; 73%) and had small-bowel obstruction (n = 131; 78%). There was a significantly shorter cumulative hospital length of stay (LOSsum) within the first 60 days of MBO diagnosis in the MBO program group compared with the baseline group (13 v 22 days, respectively; adjusted P = .006). The median overall survival for women treated in the MBO program was also significantly longer compared with the baseline group (243 v 99 days, respectively; adjusted P = .002). Using the interprofessional MBO care platform, a greater proportion of patients received palliative chemotherapy (83% v 56%) and less surgery (11% v 21%) in the MBO program group than in the baseline group, respectively. A subgroup of women (n = 11) received total parenteral nutrition for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a comprehensive, interprofessional MBO program significantly affects patient care and may improve outcomes. Unique to this MBO program is an integrated outpatient model of care and education that empowers patients to recognize MBO symptoms for early intervention.","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"15 1","pages":"e1066 - e1075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1200/JOP.18.00793","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

PURPOSE: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common and distressing complication in women with advanced gynecologic cancer. A pilot, interprofessional MBO program was launched in 2016 at a large Canadian tertiary cancer center to integrate these patients’ complex care needs across multiple disciplines and support women with MBO. METHOD: Retrospective analysis to evaluate the outcomes of women with advanced gynecologic cancer who were admitted to hospital because of MBO, before (2014 to 2016: baseline group) and after (2016 to 2018) implementation of the MBO program. RESULTS: Of the 169 women evaluated, 106 and 63 were in the baseline group and MBO program group, respectively. Most had ovarian cancer (n = 124; 73%) and had small-bowel obstruction (n = 131; 78%). There was a significantly shorter cumulative hospital length of stay (LOSsum) within the first 60 days of MBO diagnosis in the MBO program group compared with the baseline group (13 v 22 days, respectively; adjusted P = .006). The median overall survival for women treated in the MBO program was also significantly longer compared with the baseline group (243 v 99 days, respectively; adjusted P = .002). Using the interprofessional MBO care platform, a greater proportion of patients received palliative chemotherapy (83% v 56%) and less surgery (11% v 21%) in the MBO program group than in the baseline group, respectively. A subgroup of women (n = 11) received total parenteral nutrition for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a comprehensive, interprofessional MBO program significantly affects patient care and may improve outcomes. Unique to this MBO program is an integrated outpatient model of care and education that empowers patients to recognize MBO symptoms for early intervention.
优化晚期妇科肿瘤恶性肠梗阻的护理
恶性肠梗阻(MBO)是晚期妇科癌症患者常见而痛苦的并发症。2016年,加拿大一家大型癌症三级中心启动了一项跨专业MBO试点计划,以整合这些患者在多个学科的复杂护理需求,并支持MBO女性。方法:回顾性分析因MBO住院的晚期妇科癌症患者在实施MBO计划之前(2014年至2016年:基线组)和之后(2016年至2018年)的结局。结果:在169名接受评估的女性中,106名和63名分别属于基线组和MBO计划组。大多数患者患有卵巢癌症(n=124;73%)和小肠梗阻(n=131;78%)。与基线组相比,MBO项目组在MBO诊断的前60天内的累计住院时间(LOSsum)显著缩短(分别为13天和22天;调整后的P=0.006)。接受MBO项目治疗的女性的中位总生存期也显著长于基线组(分别为243天和99天;调整后P=0.002)。使用跨专业MBO护理平台,MBO项目组接受姑息性化疗的患者比例(83%和56%)高于基线组,接受较少手术的患者比例分别为11%和21%。一组妇女(n=11)接受了超过6个月的全胃肠外营养。结论:实施全面的跨专业MBO计划会显著影响患者护理,并可能改善结果。该MBO计划的独特之处在于一种综合的门诊护理和教育模式,使患者能够识别MBO症状并进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信