Evaluation of yield and other agronomic traits in pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) under open-field conditions in the humid tropics

IF 0.2 Q4 AGRONOMY
K. Ali, P. Umaharan, R. Brathwaite, W. Elibox
{"title":"Evaluation of yield and other agronomic traits in pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) under open-field conditions in the humid tropics","authors":"K. Ali, P. Umaharan, R. Brathwaite, W. Elibox","doi":"10.37234/ta/0000960102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sixty-eight pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) accessions were evaluated for yield (measured as total number of fruits per plant and total fruit weight per plant) and 15 other traits under open-field conditions in two trials, one conducted in the dry (Trial-1) and the other in wet season (Trial-2) of 2014. Each trial was set in a randomized complete block design with three replications (20 plants per replicate) at The University of the West Indies Field Station, Mount Hope, Trinidad and Tobago. There were significant differences (p < 0.01 to 0.001) among the accessions for all traits except plant height, plant canopy width in Trial-1, and early vigour in Trial-2. Total number of fruits per plants was weakly correlated (r = 0.37 in Trial-1, r = 0.45 in Trial-2; p < 0.01 to 0.001) with total fruit weight per plant, but was strongly associated with number of fruits per plant in the first and second 5 pickings (r = 0.78 to 0.97, p < 0.001) and moderately negatively correlated (r = -0.33 to -0.56, p < 0.01 to 0.001) with fruit width and average fruit weight. Total fruit weight per plant was positively associated with fruit weight per plant in the first and second 5 pickings (r = 0.66 to 0.89, p < 0.001), and negatively correlated (r = -0.41 to -0.69, p < 0.001) with days to 50% flowering and fruiting. A comparison of linear regression lines showed that the relative ranking of the accessions over seasons did not change for days to 50% flowering and fruiting, fruit weight per plant in the second 5 pickings, total fruit weight per plant and fruit width. The implications of these results are discussed.","PeriodicalId":23297,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Agriculture","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37234/ta/0000960102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sixty-eight pepper (Capsicum chinense Jacq.) accessions were evaluated for yield (measured as total number of fruits per plant and total fruit weight per plant) and 15 other traits under open-field conditions in two trials, one conducted in the dry (Trial-1) and the other in wet season (Trial-2) of 2014. Each trial was set in a randomized complete block design with three replications (20 plants per replicate) at The University of the West Indies Field Station, Mount Hope, Trinidad and Tobago. There were significant differences (p < 0.01 to 0.001) among the accessions for all traits except plant height, plant canopy width in Trial-1, and early vigour in Trial-2. Total number of fruits per plants was weakly correlated (r = 0.37 in Trial-1, r = 0.45 in Trial-2; p < 0.01 to 0.001) with total fruit weight per plant, but was strongly associated with number of fruits per plant in the first and second 5 pickings (r = 0.78 to 0.97, p < 0.001) and moderately negatively correlated (r = -0.33 to -0.56, p < 0.01 to 0.001) with fruit width and average fruit weight. Total fruit weight per plant was positively associated with fruit weight per plant in the first and second 5 pickings (r = 0.66 to 0.89, p < 0.001), and negatively correlated (r = -0.41 to -0.69, p < 0.001) with days to 50% flowering and fruiting. A comparison of linear regression lines showed that the relative ranking of the accessions over seasons did not change for days to 50% flowering and fruiting, fruit weight per plant in the second 5 pickings, total fruit weight per plant and fruit width. The implications of these results are discussed.
湿润热带露天条件下辣椒产量及其他农艺性状评价
在2014年的两个试验中,一个在旱季(Trial-1)进行,另一个在雨季(Trial-2)进行,对68份辣椒(Capsicum chinense Jacq.)材料在露地条件下的产量(以单株总果数和单株总果重衡量)和其他15个性状进行了评估。每项试验都是在特立尼达和多巴哥霍普山西印度群岛大学野外站进行的随机完全区组设计中进行的,每次重复20株。除株高、冠层宽度和早期活力外,Trial-1的所有性状在材料间均存在显著差异(p<0.01至0.001)。单株总果数与单株总果重呈弱相关(Trial-1中r=0.37,Trial-2中r=0.45;p<0.01至0.001),但与第一次和第二次5次采摘中的单株果数呈强相关(r=0.78至0.97,p<0.001),与果宽和平均果重呈中度负相关(r=-0.33至-0.56,p<0.01至0.001)。在第一次和第二次5次采摘中,单株总果重与单株果重呈正相关(r=0.66至0.89,p<0.001),与50%开花结果天数呈负相关(r=-0.41至-0.69,p<001)。线性回归线的比较表明,材料在不同季节的相对排名在开花和结果达到50%的天数、第二次5次采摘的单株果重、单株总果重和果宽没有变化。讨论了这些结果的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Agriculture
Tropical Agriculture Social Sciences-Development
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The overarching aim of Tropical Agriculture is to contribute to the process of agricultural development in tropical agro-ecosystems, through publication of papers in the area of agricultural science and technology. The specific objectives of the Journal are: -To address the practical aspects of sustainable tropical agriculture production, improvement, protection and commodity utilization, worldwide. -To foster the application of science and technology to understanding and removal of constraints to tropical agricultural productivity. -To publish the results of original research which make significant contributions to knowledge on the practice of sustainable and productive tropical agriculture. The Journal publishes papers in the following areas of tropical agriculture: -Soil Science and Technology -Environmental Science and Technology -Crop Science and Technology -Livestock Science and Technology as well as: Food and Nutrition Policy, Post-Harvest Technology, Agricultural Economics and Extension, Agribusiness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信