The Antinociceptive Effect of Genicular Nerves Block Compared to Intra-Articular Dexamethasone in Grade III or IV Knee Osteoarthritis

G. Lauretti, Davi L. R. Santos, C. Oliveira, Carlos Trintade
{"title":"The Antinociceptive Effect of Genicular Nerves Block Compared to Intra-Articular Dexamethasone in Grade III or IV Knee Osteoarthritis","authors":"G. Lauretti, Davi L. R. Santos, C. Oliveira, Carlos Trintade","doi":"10.4236/jbise.2019.1210036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis is a common pathology reflecting on the capacity of undertaking daily activities. Among non-surgical procedures, intra-articular corticosteroids represent an alternative complementary therapy. However, blocking the genicular nerves is a recently described technique, easily applied for clinical management. Objectives: To compare efficacy of both intra-articular corticosteroid and genicular block for chronic knee pain. Methods: 20 patients with osteoarthritis were evaluated for: 1) the intensity of pain; 2) the quality of sleep; 3) the capacity to undertake daily activities. Two groups were formed randomly, the first submitted to intra-articular blocking and the second to blocking the genicular nerves. A solution of plane 90 mg lidocaine 1%, and dexamethasone 10 mg was standard and used for intervention in both procedures to a final 10-ml volume. After a weekly appraisal for 12 consecutive weeks, the patients were recalled and submitted to another proposed procedure and in this way, all the patients acted as their own control (a “crossover” study design). In the following weeks, as also in the pretest, the intensity of pain, the quality of sleep and the capacity of undertaking daily activities were evaluated. Results: Both the intra-articular block and the genicular nerves block resulted equally in important reduction of pain during 11 weeks, with similar improvement in the quality of night sleep, and in the capacity of daily activities (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The blocking of the genicular nerves was a safe alternative, minimally invasive and highly efficient, similar to the intra-articular corticosteroid.","PeriodicalId":64231,"journal":{"name":"生物医学工程(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物医学工程(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2019.1210036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Knee pain secondary to osteoarthritis is a common pathology reflecting on the capacity of undertaking daily activities. Among non-surgical procedures, intra-articular corticosteroids represent an alternative complementary therapy. However, blocking the genicular nerves is a recently described technique, easily applied for clinical management. Objectives: To compare efficacy of both intra-articular corticosteroid and genicular block for chronic knee pain. Methods: 20 patients with osteoarthritis were evaluated for: 1) the intensity of pain; 2) the quality of sleep; 3) the capacity to undertake daily activities. Two groups were formed randomly, the first submitted to intra-articular blocking and the second to blocking the genicular nerves. A solution of plane 90 mg lidocaine 1%, and dexamethasone 10 mg was standard and used for intervention in both procedures to a final 10-ml volume. After a weekly appraisal for 12 consecutive weeks, the patients were recalled and submitted to another proposed procedure and in this way, all the patients acted as their own control (a “crossover” study design). In the following weeks, as also in the pretest, the intensity of pain, the quality of sleep and the capacity of undertaking daily activities were evaluated. Results: Both the intra-articular block and the genicular nerves block resulted equally in important reduction of pain during 11 weeks, with similar improvement in the quality of night sleep, and in the capacity of daily activities (p < 0.05). Conclusions: The blocking of the genicular nerves was a safe alternative, minimally invasive and highly efficient, similar to the intra-articular corticosteroid.
膝关节神经阻滞与关节内地塞米松治疗III级或IV级膝骨性关节炎的抗伤害性效果比较
简介:继发于骨关节炎的膝关节疼痛是一种常见的病理学,反映了日常活动的能力。在非手术治疗中,关节内皮质类固醇是一种替代的补充疗法。然而,阻断膝神经是最近描述的一种技术,很容易应用于临床管理。目的:比较关节内皮质类固醇和膝关节阻滞治疗慢性膝关节疼痛的疗效。方法:对20例骨关节炎患者进行评估:1)疼痛强度;2) 睡眠质量;3) 进行日常活动的能力。随机形成两组,第一组接受关节内阻滞,第二组接受膝神经阻滞。标准溶液为90 mg 1%利多卡因和10 mg地塞米松,用于两种程序的干预,最终体积为10 ml。在连续12周的每周评估后,患者被召回并接受另一项拟议的手术,通过这种方式,所有患者都作为自己的对照(“交叉”研究设计)。在接下来的几周里,与预测试一样,对疼痛强度、睡眠质量和日常活动能力进行了评估。结果:在11周内,关节内阻滞和膝神经阻滞同样能显著减轻疼痛,夜间睡眠质量和日常活动能力也有类似的改善(p<0.05)。结论:膝神经阻滞是一种安全、微创、高效的替代方法,类似于关节内皮质类固醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
900
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信