„Passivität im Kostüm der Aktivität“. Über Günther Anders’ Kritik kybernetischer Politik im Zeitalter der „totalen Maschine“

Felix Maschewski, Anna-Verena Nosthoff
{"title":"„Passivität im Kostüm der Aktivität“. Über Günther Anders’ Kritik kybernetischer Politik im Zeitalter der „totalen Maschine“","authors":"Felix Maschewski, Anna-Verena Nosthoff","doi":"10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various media-theoretical studies have recently characterized the fourth industrial revolution as a process of all-encompassing technicization and cybernetization. Against this background, this paper seeks to show the timely and critical potential of Gunther Anders’s magnum opus Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen vis-a-vis the ever-increasing power of cybernetic devices and networks. Anders has both witnessed, and negotiated, the process of cybernetization from its very beginning, having criticised not only its tendency of automatization and expansion, but also the circular logic and the “integral power” it rests upon, including the destructive consequences for the constitution of the political and the social. In this vein, Anders’s oeuvre can indeed shed new light on the techno-logically organized milieus of the contemporary digital regime. The aim of the essay is, thus, not only to emphasize the contemporariness of Anders’s critical thought, but also use it to frame a critique vis-a-vis current neo-technocratic and, ultimately, post-political concepts, such as “algorithmic regulation”, “smart states”, “direct technocracy”, and “government as platform”. The essay finally seeks to, through Anders’s lens, address the question of the position and role of the critic in relation to ever expanding technical environments.","PeriodicalId":30203,"journal":{"name":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","volume":"11 1","pages":"8-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behemoth a Journal on Civilisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6094/BEHEMOTH.2018.11.1.976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Various media-theoretical studies have recently characterized the fourth industrial revolution as a process of all-encompassing technicization and cybernetization. Against this background, this paper seeks to show the timely and critical potential of Gunther Anders’s magnum opus Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen vis-a-vis the ever-increasing power of cybernetic devices and networks. Anders has both witnessed, and negotiated, the process of cybernetization from its very beginning, having criticised not only its tendency of automatization and expansion, but also the circular logic and the “integral power” it rests upon, including the destructive consequences for the constitution of the political and the social. In this vein, Anders’s oeuvre can indeed shed new light on the techno-logically organized milieus of the contemporary digital regime. The aim of the essay is, thus, not only to emphasize the contemporariness of Anders’s critical thought, but also use it to frame a critique vis-a-vis current neo-technocratic and, ultimately, post-political concepts, such as “algorithmic regulation”, “smart states”, “direct technocracy”, and “government as platform”. The essay finally seeks to, through Anders’s lens, address the question of the position and role of the critic in relation to ever expanding technical environments.
“活动服装中的被动性”——论Günther Anders对“全面机器”时代控制论政治的批判
最近,各种媒体理论研究将第四次工业革命描述为一个包罗万象的技术化和控制论化的过程。在此背景下,本文试图展示冈瑟·安德斯的巨著《人之古物》(Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen)面对不断增长的控制论设备和网络的力量时所具有的时代性和批判性潜力。安德斯从一开始就见证和讨论了控制论化的过程,他不仅批判了控制论化的自动化和扩张倾向,而且批判了控制论化所依赖的循环逻辑和“整体权力”,包括对政治和社会构成的破坏性后果。在这方面,安德斯的作品确实可以为当代数字政权的技术-逻辑组织环境提供新的视角。因此,本文的目的不仅是强调安德斯批判思想的当代性,而且要用它来构建对当前新技术官僚主义以及最终的后政治概念的批判,如“算法监管”、“智能国家”、“直接技术官僚主义”和“作为平台的政府”。这篇文章最后试图通过安德斯的镜头,解决批评家在不断扩大的技术环境中的地位和作用问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信