Was Stalin a Marxist? And If He Was, What Does This Mean for Marxism?

IF 0.9 4区社会学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Historical Materialism-Research in Critical Marxist Theory Pub Date : 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1163/1569206x-bja10007

R. Suny

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stalin was a Marxist, but a certain kind of Marxist who selected out of the body of work of Marx, Engels, and Lenin a non-democratic and inhumane form of Marxism leaving out the humanist and democratic aspects of the original Marxist programme. The means he chose to build what he considered a socialist society fatally tainted the goal of a society in which working people make the fundamental decisions that determine their lives.

查看原文本刊更多论文

斯大林是马克思主义者吗?如果他是，这对马克思主义意味着什么?

斯大林是马克思主义者，但他从马克思、恩格斯和列宁的著作中选择了一种非民主、非人道的马克思主义形式，忽略了马克思主义最初纲领中的人文主义和民主方面。他所选择的建设他所认为的社会主义社会的手段，致命地玷污了一个社会的目标，在这个社会中，劳动人民做出决定他们生活的根本决定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Historical Materialism-Research in Critical Marxist Theory Multiple-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Historical Materialism is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to exploring and developing the critical and explanatory potential of Marxist theory. The journal started as a project at the London School of Economics from 1995 to 1998. The advisory editorial board comprises many leading Marxists, including Robert Brenner, Maurice Godelier, Michael Lebowitz, Justin Rosenberg, Ellen Meiksins Wood and others. Marxism has manifested itself in the late 1990s from the pages of the Financial Times to new work by Fredric Jameson, Terry Eagleton and David Harvey. Unburdened by pre-1989 ideological baggage, Historical Materialism stands at the edge of a vibrant intellectual current, publishing a new generation of Marxist thinkers and scholars.