Reply from Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi

IF 2.1 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Yitzchak Y. Jaffe, Rod Campbell, Gideon Shelach-Lavi
{"title":"Reply from Jaffe, Campbell, and Shelach-Lavi","authors":"Yitzchak Y. Jaffe, Rod Campbell, Gideon Shelach-Lavi","doi":"10.1086/726354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disagreements and disputes are the essence of academic discourse and are the engine of research progress. We are glad that our paper is getting attention and welcome comments on it, even those that utterly reject our views and ideas. However, we believe that there are norms of professional conduct in academic debate. Personal attacks fall outside those norms. Speculations of personal motive and baseless slinging of accu-sations of gender (Li Min) or other more amorphous biases (Liu and Chen; Dai) are things one expects to fi nd in social media fl ame wars and not in a respectable academic journal.","PeriodicalId":48343,"journal":{"name":"Current Anthropology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726354","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disagreements and disputes are the essence of academic discourse and are the engine of research progress. We are glad that our paper is getting attention and welcome comments on it, even those that utterly reject our views and ideas. However, we believe that there are norms of professional conduct in academic debate. Personal attacks fall outside those norms. Speculations of personal motive and baseless slinging of accu-sations of gender (Li Min) or other more amorphous biases (Liu and Chen; Dai) are things one expects to fi nd in social media fl ame wars and not in a respectable academic journal.
Jaffe、Campbell和Shelach Lavi的回复
分歧和争论是学术话语的本质,是研究进步的动力。我们很高兴我们的论文得到了关注,并欢迎对它发表评论,即使是那些完全反对我们观点和想法的评论。然而,我们认为在学术辩论中有职业行为规范。人身攻击不属于这些标准。对个人动机的猜测和毫无根据的对性别的指责(李敏)或其他更模糊的偏见(刘和陈;戴)是人们希望在社交媒体上的游戏大战中找到的东西,而不是在一份受人尊敬的学术期刊上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Anthropology
Current Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Current Anthropology is a transnational journal devoted to research on humankind, encompassing the full range of anthropological scholarship on human cultures and on the human and other primate species. Communicating across the subfields, the journal features papers in a wide variety of areas, including social, cultural, and physical anthropology as well as ethnology and ethnohistory, archaeology and prehistory, folklore, and linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信