A Heuristic Analysis of Covid-19 At-Home Test Kits’ Usability

Alexis M. DiBello, P. Thai, Kathren Pavlov, F. Montalvo, D. McConnell, J. Smither
{"title":"A Heuristic Analysis of Covid-19 At-Home Test Kits’ Usability","authors":"Alexis M. DiBello, P. Thai, Kathren Pavlov, F. Montalvo, D. McConnell, J. Smither","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As COVID-19 cases continue to be prevalent, at-home testing for the illness will continue to be in demand. At-home testing is convenient as results are obtained quickly and often at a lower cost. This study utilized Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics to evaluate at-home COVID-19 test kits, with consideration given to older users when applicable. Understanding whether users can correctly use and interpret these tests is critical to ensure the kits provide accurate results and to ensure user trust. Results of our analysis showed that there is a need for at-home COVID-19 test kits to improve the way results are presented and implement more error prevention techniques. In regards to older users, the kits would benefit from clearing up ambiguities which require reference materials, accommodating users with contrast sensitivity difficulties, and ensuring that the test kit products are easy to manually handle. While the kits have acceptable usability, improvements to the usability of COVID-19 at-home test kits will lead to lower user errors and improved result accuracy.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"179 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As COVID-19 cases continue to be prevalent, at-home testing for the illness will continue to be in demand. At-home testing is convenient as results are obtained quickly and often at a lower cost. This study utilized Nielsen’s Ten Usability Heuristics to evaluate at-home COVID-19 test kits, with consideration given to older users when applicable. Understanding whether users can correctly use and interpret these tests is critical to ensure the kits provide accurate results and to ensure user trust. Results of our analysis showed that there is a need for at-home COVID-19 test kits to improve the way results are presented and implement more error prevention techniques. In regards to older users, the kits would benefit from clearing up ambiguities which require reference materials, accommodating users with contrast sensitivity difficulties, and ensuring that the test kit products are easy to manually handle. While the kits have acceptable usability, improvements to the usability of COVID-19 at-home test kits will lead to lower user errors and improved result accuracy.
新冠肺炎At-Home检测试剂盒可用性的启发式分析
随着新冠肺炎病例继续流行,将继续需要在家进行检测。在家测试很方便,因为结果可以快速获得,而且通常成本较低。这项研究利用尼尔森的“十种可用性启发”来评估家庭新冠肺炎检测试剂盒,并在适用时考虑老年用户。了解用户是否能够正确使用和解释这些测试对于确保试剂盒提供准确的结果和确保用户信任至关重要。我们的分析结果表明,需要在家中使用新冠肺炎检测试剂盒,以改进结果的呈现方式,并实施更多的错误预防技术。对于年龄较大的用户,试剂盒将受益于消除需要参考材料的歧义,为有对比敏感度困难的用户提供便利,并确保试剂盒产品易于手动处理。虽然试剂盒具有可接受的可用性,但改善新冠肺炎家庭检测试剂盒的可用性将降低用户错误并提高结果准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信