Detection of Outlier Observations in Piezometric Measurements: A Case Study in the Southern Region of Poland

Q3 Social Sciences
Stanisław Lach
{"title":"Detection of Outlier Observations in Piezometric Measurements: A Case Study in the Southern Region of Poland","authors":"Stanisław Lach","doi":"10.7494/geom.2022.16.1.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the main modes of monitoring the geotechnical conditions of earth dams is piezometric measurement, which measures water levels in an open piezometer or water pressure in a closed piezometer. During piezometric measurements, various types of factors can cause disturbances in these measurements that take the form of systematic, accidental, or obvious mistakes. Before measurements from open or closed piezometers are analyzed, outliers due to coarse errors should be detected and rejected. Such observations may significantly influence the result of the analysis and cause erroneous assessment and interpretation of the phenomenon studied. To do this, statistical tests must be applied so that the doubtful measurement can be accepted or rejected at the assumed significance level. This paper uses five statistical tests for identifying and rejecting outliers: the Q-Dixon test, the Grubbs test, as well as the Hampel test, the Iglewicz and Hoaglin test, and the Rosner test. The aim of this article is to try to identify the most suitable test for periodic piezometric measurements. The scope of the study includes the analysis of piezometric measurements for the Czaniec Dam for the multi-year period 2017–2020.","PeriodicalId":36672,"journal":{"name":"Geomatics and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomatics and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/geom.2022.16.1.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main modes of monitoring the geotechnical conditions of earth dams is piezometric measurement, which measures water levels in an open piezometer or water pressure in a closed piezometer. During piezometric measurements, various types of factors can cause disturbances in these measurements that take the form of systematic, accidental, or obvious mistakes. Before measurements from open or closed piezometers are analyzed, outliers due to coarse errors should be detected and rejected. Such observations may significantly influence the result of the analysis and cause erroneous assessment and interpretation of the phenomenon studied. To do this, statistical tests must be applied so that the doubtful measurement can be accepted or rejected at the assumed significance level. This paper uses five statistical tests for identifying and rejecting outliers: the Q-Dixon test, the Grubbs test, as well as the Hampel test, the Iglewicz and Hoaglin test, and the Rosner test. The aim of this article is to try to identify the most suitable test for periodic piezometric measurements. The scope of the study includes the analysis of piezometric measurements for the Czaniec Dam for the multi-year period 2017–2020.
测压测量中异常值观测的检测:波兰南部地区的一个案例研究
土坝岩土状况监测的主要方式之一是压力测量,即用开式压力计测量水位或闭式压力计测量水压。在压力测量过程中,各种类型的因素可能会在这些测量中引起干扰,这些干扰以系统的、偶然的或明显的错误的形式出现。在分析开式或闭式压电计的测量结果之前,应检测并排除由于粗误差而产生的异常值。这种观察结果可能会严重影响分析结果,并导致对所研究现象的错误评估和解释。要做到这一点,必须应用统计检验,以便在假设的显著性水平上接受或拒绝可疑的测量。本文使用了五种统计检验来识别和拒绝异常值:Q-Dixon检验、Grubbs检验、Hampel检验、Iglewicz and Hoaglin检验和Rosner检验。本文的目的是试图确定最适合周期性压力测量的测试。本研究的范围包括分析2017-2020年期间Czaniec大坝的压力测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geomatics and Environmental Engineering
Geomatics and Environmental Engineering Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信