In Search of Ontologies of Entanglement

IF 2.1 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Daedalus Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1162/daed_a_01987

Ann M. Pendleton-Jullian, J. Brown

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We live in a world of entanglement, not enlightenment. We discuss why the two are not collapsible. Then, in search of concepts, methods, and sources for a frame of entanglement, we look at how an ontological turn in the social sciences helps us see the relationship between worldviews, values, and the complex practices of how societies enact their worlds, with an eye to those worldviews that assume, live, and enact entanglement. Finally, we offer some thoughts on moving beyond theory to action. Stimulated by the critical themes in Federica Carugati and Nathan Schneider's essay, and believing that “it matters what concepts we use to think concepts with,” we interrogate and expand on their themes to widen the conceptual aperture around the call for remaking our systems of governance.1

查看原文本刊更多论文

寻找纠缠本体论

摘要我们生活在一个纠缠的世界，而不是启蒙的世界。我们讨论了为什么两者不可折叠。然后，在寻找纠缠框架的概念、方法和来源时，我们着眼于社会科学中的本体论转向如何帮助我们看到世界观、价值观和社会如何构建世界的复杂实践之间的关系，着眼于那些假设、生活和实现纠缠的世界观。最后，我们提出了一些从理论到行动的思考。在Federica Carugati和Nathan Schneider文章中的批判性主题的刺激下，我们相信“用什么概念来思考概念很重要”，我们对他们的主题进行了质疑和扩展，以拓宽重塑我们治理体系的概念孔径。1

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Daedalus Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Daedalus was founded in 1955 as the Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. It draws on the enormous intellectual capacity of the American Academy, whose members are among the nation"s most prominent thinkers in the arts, sciences, and humanities. Each issue addresses a theme with authoritative essays on topics such as judicial independence, reflecting on the humanities, the global nuclear future, the challenge of mass incarceration, the future of news, the economy, the military, and race.