Kontestasi Dan Resepsi Akademis Atas Fatwa Mui Tentang Covid-19: Tinjauan Bibliografis Atas Monografi Tahun 2020-2021

Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora Pub Date : 2022-01-04 DOI:10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163

Ahmad Fawaid

{"title":"Kontestasi Dan Resepsi Akademis Atas Fatwa Mui Tentang Covid-19: Tinjauan Bibliografis Atas Monografi Tahun 2020-2021","authors":"Ahmad Fawaid","doi":"10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study aims to observe the contestation and academic reception of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Covid-19. These fatwas invite many responses in academic circles written in reputable journal articles. With a qualitative research paradigm and using Hans Robert Jauss text reception theory, this research concludes that; this study found four typologies of the MUI Fatwa monograph on Covid-19 during 2020-2021; namely (1) Monograph Typology, which discusses the Role of Fatwa (6 titles); (2) Discussing aspects of contact with other scientific disciplines, such as Maqāṣid,; (3) Unraveling the 'tangled thread' conflicting interpretations of the fatwa; (4) an article that measures the level of obedience of the Indonesian Muslim community to the MUI fatwa. Of the existing articles, 13 were built with justification based on the text, 5 articles were built with apologetic reasoning, and 3 used critical reasoning. From this conclusion, this study confirms that the academic response to the MUI Fatwa on Covid-19 also experienced Fragmentation, Resistance, and Appreciation.","PeriodicalId":33042,"journal":{"name":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35719/Islamikainside.v7i2.163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to observe the contestation and academic reception of fatwas issued by the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) regarding Covid-19. These fatwas invite many responses in academic circles written in reputable journal articles. With a qualitative research paradigm and using Hans Robert Jauss text reception theory, this research concludes that; this study found four typologies of the MUI Fatwa monograph on Covid-19 during 2020-2021; namely (1) Monograph Typology, which discusses the Role of Fatwa (6 titles); (2) Discussing aspects of contact with other scientific disciplines, such as Maqāṣid,; (3) Unraveling the 'tangled thread' conflicting interpretations of the fatwa; (4) an article that measures the level of obedience of the Indonesian Muslim community to the MUI fatwa. Of the existing articles, 13 were built with justification based on the text, 5 articles were built with apologetic reasoning, and 3 used critical reasoning. From this conclusion, this study confirms that the academic response to the MUI Fatwa on Covid-19 also experienced Fragmentation, Resistance, and Appreciation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于Covid-19的教规的摘录和学术接待:2002 -2021年的文献综述

摘要：本研究旨在观察印度尼西亚乌莱马理事会（MUI）发布的关于新冠肺炎的法令的争议和学术接受情况。这些法令在学术界引起了许多反响，发表在声誉良好的期刊文章中。本研究采用定性研究范式，运用汉斯-罗伯特·贾斯文本接受理论，得出以下结论：；这项研究发现，在2020-2021年期间，MUI Fatwa关于新冠肺炎的专著有四种类型；即（1）专著类型学，讨论法特瓦的作用（6个标题）；（2）讨论与其他科学学科接触的各个方面，如Maqāṣid，；（3）解开对法特瓦的相互矛盾的解释；（4）一篇衡量印尼穆斯林社区对MUI法特瓦的服从程度的文章。在现有的文章中，13篇是基于文本的正当性构建的，5篇是基于道歉推理构建的，3篇使用了批判性推理。根据这一结论，本研究证实，学术界对MUI Fatwa关于新冠肺炎的反应也经历了分裂、抵抗和赞赏。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Islamika Inside Jurnal Keislaman dan Humaniora

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

30 weeks