Special Issue: Postqualitative inquiry: Theory and practice in environmental education

IF 2.2 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Paul J. B. Hart, P. White
{"title":"Special Issue: Postqualitative inquiry: Theory and practice in environmental education","authors":"Paul J. B. Hart, P. White","doi":"10.1017/aee.2022.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Special Issue of AJEE is an assemblage of creative starting points for postqualitative inquiry. Mazzei (2021), after St. Pierre (2011), has described postqualitative inquiry in terms of direct groundings in theoretical/philosophical literature. The purpose of theory is to help us better understand our world as well as to lead us to informed action (Brookfield, 2005). ‘ Postqualitative ’ can be distilled by the phrase ‘ thinking with theory ’ (Jackson & Mazzei, 2012, 2018) to encounter different ways that theory-based concepts can produce thought that happens ‘ in the middle of things ’ . Inquiries are shaped in working concepts together within problems. Concepts help us to disentangle how we have come to think and see in certain ways, making it possible to see differently (Hart, 2014). Directly implicated are extant empirical and ethical applications of theory directly within philosophical positions, often associated with new materialist and posthumanist thinking. Such shiftings in theory/praxis are increasingly recognised within impending concerns about the value of a qualitative inquiry, complicated by bioethical and bio-political issues of the Anthropocene and beyond. The turn researchers Hargraves describes explore how we might reconceptualise inquiry where researchers and participants become entangled as living assemblages in ways that disrupt and deterritorialise and that move beyond linguistic poststructuralist discursive toward the material experience. ‘ not practice; practice. ,","PeriodicalId":44842,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","volume":"38 1","pages":"201 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This Special Issue of AJEE is an assemblage of creative starting points for postqualitative inquiry. Mazzei (2021), after St. Pierre (2011), has described postqualitative inquiry in terms of direct groundings in theoretical/philosophical literature. The purpose of theory is to help us better understand our world as well as to lead us to informed action (Brookfield, 2005). ‘ Postqualitative ’ can be distilled by the phrase ‘ thinking with theory ’ (Jackson & Mazzei, 2012, 2018) to encounter different ways that theory-based concepts can produce thought that happens ‘ in the middle of things ’ . Inquiries are shaped in working concepts together within problems. Concepts help us to disentangle how we have come to think and see in certain ways, making it possible to see differently (Hart, 2014). Directly implicated are extant empirical and ethical applications of theory directly within philosophical positions, often associated with new materialist and posthumanist thinking. Such shiftings in theory/praxis are increasingly recognised within impending concerns about the value of a qualitative inquiry, complicated by bioethical and bio-political issues of the Anthropocene and beyond. The turn researchers Hargraves describes explore how we might reconceptualise inquiry where researchers and participants become entangled as living assemblages in ways that disrupt and deterritorialise and that move beyond linguistic poststructuralist discursive toward the material experience. ‘ not practice; practice. ,
特刊:后质性探究:环境教育的理论与实践
本期《AJEE》特刊汇集了后质性探究的创造性起点。继St. Pierre(2011)之后,Mazzei(2021)从理论/哲学文献的直接基础方面描述了后质性探究。理论的目的是帮助我们更好地理解我们的世界,并引导我们采取明智的行动(Brookfield, 2005)。“后定性”可以通过短语“用理论思考”(Jackson & Mazzei, 2012, 2018)来提炼,以遇到基于理论的概念可以产生“在事物中间”发生的思想的不同方式。调查是在问题中共同工作的概念中形成的。概念帮助我们理清我们是如何以某种方式思考和观察的,从而有可能以不同的方式看待问题(Hart, 2014)。直接涉及的是现有的经验和伦理应用理论直接在哲学立场,往往与新唯物主义和后人文主义的思想。这种理论/实践的转变越来越多地在迫在眉睫的对定性调查价值的关注中得到认可,人类世及以后的生物伦理和生物政治问题使其复杂化。研究人员Hargraves描述的转变探讨了我们如何重新定义探究,在探究中,研究人员和参与者以破坏和去地域化的方式纠缠在一起,并超越语言后结构主义话语,走向物质经验。“不是练习;练习。,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Environmental Education
Australian Journal of Environmental Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: An internationally refereed journal which publishes papers and reports on all aspects of environmental education. It presents information and argument which stimulates debate about educational strategies that enhance the kinds of awareness, understanding and actions which will promote environmental and social justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信