Spatial ecological interactions between coyote and gray fox in a temperate forest

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Therya Pub Date : 2021-09-19 DOI:10.12933/therya-21-1128
C. R. Rodríguez-Luna, J. Servín, D. Valenzuela-Galván, R. List
{"title":"Spatial ecological interactions between coyote and gray fox in a temperate forest","authors":"C. R. Rodríguez-Luna, J. Servín, D. Valenzuela-Galván, R. List","doi":"10.12933/therya-21-1128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coyotes (Canis latrans) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) are abundant and widely distributed in México, with no information currently available about their spatial interactions in the country.  Our objectives were to evaluate the habitat use of these species and the environmental interactions between them throughout the overlapping areas of their home ranges in temperate forests of Durango, México.  We expected that their coexistence would be facilitated by the spatial segregation of their ecological niche, exhibited by the low or nil overlap between their home ranges or by differentiated habitat use.  Radio-collars (VHF) were attached to nine individuals — four coyotes (two males and two females) and five gray foxes (females) — that were radio-tracked from September 2017 to August 2019.  We estimated their home ranges and the size of their core areas through the minimum convex polygon and determined the extent of overlap between them.  Also, we evaluated third-order habitat selection and use based on habitat availability using Manly’s habitat-selection ratios and simultaneous Bonferroni confidence intervals (95 %).  The mean home range size for coyotes was larger (12.2 ± 1.74 km2) than for gray boxes (5.3 ± 0.67 km2); the interspecific mean overlap was 42 % (moderate).  Of these two canids, just the gray fox showed a markedly selective habitat use.  Our findings revealed a moderate overlap between the home ranges of both canids, so spatial segregation did not occur.  Although a differential habitat use was observed, explaining the coexistence between these two canids in the areas where they thrive, they tend to avoid agonistic interactions.","PeriodicalId":37851,"journal":{"name":"Therya","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12933/therya-21-1128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Coyotes (Canis latrans) and gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) are abundant and widely distributed in México, with no information currently available about their spatial interactions in the country.  Our objectives were to evaluate the habitat use of these species and the environmental interactions between them throughout the overlapping areas of their home ranges in temperate forests of Durango, México.  We expected that their coexistence would be facilitated by the spatial segregation of their ecological niche, exhibited by the low or nil overlap between their home ranges or by differentiated habitat use.  Radio-collars (VHF) were attached to nine individuals — four coyotes (two males and two females) and five gray foxes (females) — that were radio-tracked from September 2017 to August 2019.  We estimated their home ranges and the size of their core areas through the minimum convex polygon and determined the extent of overlap between them.  Also, we evaluated third-order habitat selection and use based on habitat availability using Manly’s habitat-selection ratios and simultaneous Bonferroni confidence intervals (95 %).  The mean home range size for coyotes was larger (12.2 ± 1.74 km2) than for gray boxes (5.3 ± 0.67 km2); the interspecific mean overlap was 42 % (moderate).  Of these two canids, just the gray fox showed a markedly selective habitat use.  Our findings revealed a moderate overlap between the home ranges of both canids, so spatial segregation did not occur.  Although a differential habitat use was observed, explaining the coexistence between these two canids in the areas where they thrive, they tend to avoid agonistic interactions.
温带森林中土狼与灰狐的空间生态相互作用
土狼(Canis latrans)和灰狐(Urocyon cinereoargenteus)数量丰富,分布广泛,目前还没有关于它们在该国空间相互作用的信息。我们的目标是评估这些物种的栖息地利用以及它们之间的环境相互作用,这些相互作用贯穿了它们在杜兰戈温带森林的栖息地重叠区域。我们预计,它们的生态位的空间隔离,表现为它们的主要活动范围之间的低重叠或零重叠,或通过不同的栖息地利用,将有助于它们的共存。从2017年9月到2019年8月,无线电项圈(VHF)被固定在9只动物身上——4只土狼(2公2母)和5只灰狐(雌性)。我们通过最小凸多边形估计它们的家园范围和核心区域的大小,并确定它们之间的重叠程度。利用Manly的生境选择比和同期Bonferroni置信区间(95%)对生境可利用性进行了三级生境选择和利用评价。土狼的平均活动范围(12.2±1.74 km2)大于灰盒区(5.3±0.67 km2);种间平均重叠率为42%(中等)。在这两种犬科动物中,只有灰狐表现出明显的栖息地选择性。我们的研究结果显示,这两种犬科动物的栖息地之间存在适度的重叠,因此空间隔离没有发生。虽然观察到不同的栖息地利用,解释了这两种犬科动物在它们茁壮成长的地区共存,但它们倾向于避免竞争相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therya
Therya Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: THERYA aims to disseminate information and original and unpublished knowledge related to the study of mammals in all disciplines of knowledge. It is an open forum for teachers, researchers, professionals and students worldwide in which articles are published in Spanish and English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信