Boldly Going Vegan? Star Trek, Synthetic Meat, and Animal Ethics

IF 0.2 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Joshua Bulleid
{"title":"Boldly Going Vegan? Star Trek, Synthetic Meat, and Animal Ethics","authors":"Joshua Bulleid","doi":"10.1353/sfs.2022.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article examines the engagements with veganism, synthetic food, and animal ethics throughout Star Trek's seven live-action incarnations: The Original Series (TOS, 1966-1969), The Next Generation (TNG, 1987-1994), Deep Space Nine (DS9, 1993-1999), Voyager (1995-2001), Enterprise (2001-2005), Discovery (2017-), and Picard (2020-). I show how the separate Star Trek series maintain regular rhetorical gestures toward veganism as an ethically enlightened practice and philosophy in the framework of an influential engagement with synthetic food technology that allows for traditional, omnivorous meals without the need of nonhuman animal suffering. Star Trek's human characters, however, also frequently emphasize \"real\" food—especially meat—in connection with nostalgic Anglo-American values and supposedly superior \"natural\" living, so that meat-eating also often reflects notions of imperialism, colonization, and masculinity. Human meat-eating is also frequently represented as a sensible medium between violent, uncivilized carnism and an overly repressive veganism that is further exoticized by its associations with non-human and allegedly un-American cultures. Only the current series Discovery (2017–) takes veganism seriously as a core utopian value, due to the emphasis it places on interspecies relationships.","PeriodicalId":45553,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","volume":"49 1","pages":"322 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/sfs.2022.0028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article examines the engagements with veganism, synthetic food, and animal ethics throughout Star Trek's seven live-action incarnations: The Original Series (TOS, 1966-1969), The Next Generation (TNG, 1987-1994), Deep Space Nine (DS9, 1993-1999), Voyager (1995-2001), Enterprise (2001-2005), Discovery (2017-), and Picard (2020-). I show how the separate Star Trek series maintain regular rhetorical gestures toward veganism as an ethically enlightened practice and philosophy in the framework of an influential engagement with synthetic food technology that allows for traditional, omnivorous meals without the need of nonhuman animal suffering. Star Trek's human characters, however, also frequently emphasize "real" food—especially meat—in connection with nostalgic Anglo-American values and supposedly superior "natural" living, so that meat-eating also often reflects notions of imperialism, colonization, and masculinity. Human meat-eating is also frequently represented as a sensible medium between violent, uncivilized carnism and an overly repressive veganism that is further exoticized by its associations with non-human and allegedly un-American cultures. Only the current series Discovery (2017–) takes veganism seriously as a core utopian value, due to the emphasis it places on interspecies relationships.
大胆成为素食主义者?《星际迷航》、合成肉与动物伦理
摘要:本文探讨了《星际迷航》的七个真人化身中素食主义、合成食品和动物伦理的参与:原版系列(TOS,1966-1969)、下一代(TNG,1987-1994)、深空九号(DS9191993-1999)、旅行者号(1995-2001)、企业号(2001-2005)、发现号(2017-)和皮卡德号(2020-)。我展示了《星际迷航》系列如何在与合成食品技术进行有影响力的合作的框架下,将素食主义作为一种道德启蒙的实践和哲学,保持常规的修辞姿态,这种技术可以在不需要非人类动物痛苦的情况下提供传统的杂食性食物。然而,《星际迷航》中的人类角色也经常强调“真实”的食物,尤其是肉,这与怀旧的英美价值观和所谓优越的“自然”生活有关,因此吃肉也经常反映帝国主义、殖民主义和男子气概的概念。人类吃肉也经常被视为暴力、不文明的狂欢主义和过度压抑的素食主义之间的一种合理媒介,这种素食主义因其与非人类和据称非美国文化的联系而进一步异国化。只有目前的系列《探索》(2017–)将素食主义视为乌托邦的核心价值观,因为它强调种间关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信