Stress and burnout among attending and resident physicians in the ED: a comparative study

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, K. Taaffe, R. Pirrallo, Dotan I Shvorin
{"title":"Stress and burnout among attending and resident physicians in the ED: a comparative study","authors":"Vishnunarayan Girishan Prabhu, K. Taaffe, R. Pirrallo, Dotan I Shvorin","doi":"10.1080/24725579.2020.1814456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Emergency department physicians work in complex care settings with frequent exposure to stressful conditions. Burnout in physicians is increasing each year, and one of the most prone groups are emergency medicine providers. This research sought to understand if a difference in stress levels and burnout rate exists between attending and resident physicians working in an academic Level 1 trauma center emergency department on the same shift. Twelve attending and resident physicians from Greenville Memorial Hospital in Greenville, SC, participated in the study. Stress levels were estimated using physiological measures, including heart rate variability and electrodermal activity. Burnout scores and workload index were collected using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, and the NASA-TLX survey. Over 100 h of physiological data were collected, and 42 events were compared across the two physician groups. Attending physicians showed a higher heart rate variability for the entire shift, RMSSD (44.2 vs. 35.4, p = .033) and during the trauma events, RMSSD (47.0 vs. 35.2, p = .001), LF/HF ratio (1.7 vs. 2.5, p = .001), implying lower stress levels. Furthermore, attending physicians recorded a lower workload index (35.1 vs. 49.2, p=.004). However, no significant differences were observed in the burnout scores.","PeriodicalId":37744,"journal":{"name":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","volume":"11 1","pages":"1 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/24725579.2020.1814456","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24725579.2020.1814456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract Emergency department physicians work in complex care settings with frequent exposure to stressful conditions. Burnout in physicians is increasing each year, and one of the most prone groups are emergency medicine providers. This research sought to understand if a difference in stress levels and burnout rate exists between attending and resident physicians working in an academic Level 1 trauma center emergency department on the same shift. Twelve attending and resident physicians from Greenville Memorial Hospital in Greenville, SC, participated in the study. Stress levels were estimated using physiological measures, including heart rate variability and electrodermal activity. Burnout scores and workload index were collected using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey, and the NASA-TLX survey. Over 100 h of physiological data were collected, and 42 events were compared across the two physician groups. Attending physicians showed a higher heart rate variability for the entire shift, RMSSD (44.2 vs. 35.4, p = .033) and during the trauma events, RMSSD (47.0 vs. 35.2, p = .001), LF/HF ratio (1.7 vs. 2.5, p = .001), implying lower stress levels. Furthermore, attending physicians recorded a lower workload index (35.1 vs. 49.2, p=.004). However, no significant differences were observed in the burnout scores.
急诊科主治医师与住院医师的压力与倦怠:一项比较研究
摘要急诊科医生在复杂的护理环境中工作,经常暴露在紧张的环境中。医生的倦怠感每年都在增加,最容易发生的群体之一是急诊医生。这项研究试图了解在同一班次的一级创伤中心急诊科的主治医生和住院医生之间是否存在压力水平和倦怠率的差异。来自南卡罗来纳州格林维尔市格林维尔纪念医院的12名主治医生和住院医生参与了这项研究。压力水平是通过生理测量来估计的,包括心率变异性和皮肤电活动。使用Maslach人力服务消耗清单调查和NASA-TLX调查收集消耗分数和工作量指数。超过100 收集了h的生理数据,并对两个医生组的42个事件进行了比较。主治医生在整个轮班期间显示出更高的心率变异性,RMSSD(44.2对35.4,p=0.033),在创伤事件期间RMSSD(47.0对35.2,p=0.001),LF/HF比率(1.7对2.5,p=0.001。此外,主治医师的工作量指数较低(35.1对49.2,p=0.004)。然而,在倦怠评分方面没有观察到显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering
IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: IISE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering aims to foster the healthcare systems community by publishing high quality papers that have a strong methodological focus and direct applicability to healthcare systems. Published quarterly, the journal supports research that explores: · Healthcare Operations Management · Medical Decision Making · Socio-Technical Systems Analysis related to healthcare · Quality Engineering · Healthcare Informatics · Healthcare Policy We are looking forward to accepting submissions that document the development and use of industrial and systems engineering tools and techniques including: · Healthcare operations research · Healthcare statistics · Healthcare information systems · Healthcare work measurement · Human factors/ergonomics applied to healthcare systems Research that explores the integration of these tools and techniques with those from other engineering and medical disciplines are also featured. We encourage the submission of clinical notes, or practice notes, to show the impact of contributions that will be published. We also encourage authors to collect an impact statement from their clinical partners to show the impact of research in the clinical practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信