Why the Standard TFR gives a Misleading Impression of the Fertility of Foreign Women: Insights from Switzerland

IF 1.5 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
M. Burkimsher, C. Rossier, P. Wanner
{"title":"Why the Standard TFR gives a Misleading Impression of the Fertility of Foreign Women: Insights from Switzerland","authors":"M. Burkimsher, C. Rossier, P. Wanner","doi":"10.12765/cpos-2020-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1971 the Swiss Federal Statistical Office has published annual fertility data split by nationality (Swiss/foreign). These indicate that the TFR for women of foreign nationality has been 0.5 children higher than for Swiss women for most of the period since 1991. However, statistics from household registration (STATPOP) and the Families and Generations Surveys (FGS) in 2013 and 2018 indicate that foreign women, approaching the end of their reproductive lives, have slightly smaller families than women of Swiss nationality. The purpose of this paper is to reconcile these contradictory fertility measures. To do this, we design a novel methodology for tallying the fertility of cohorts of Swiss and foreign nationals through their reproductive life. In addition to birth registrations and population totals by age (the input data for calculating the TFR) we also include estimates of how many children women have at the time of their immigration, emigration and naturalisation. Using these input data, we compile the fertility profiles of Swiss and foreign women aged 15-49 (cohorts 1966-2003). These correspond well with the FGS and household register data. \nSeveral processes impact the final fertility of the two sub-populations. Women frequently immigrate into Switzerland in their 20s. Often arriving childless, they commonly start childbearing soon after immigration. However, there is still a flow of low-fertility women into the country in their 30s and 40s, lowering the average fertility of the foreign population. By contrast, Swiss women start childbearing later and a significant proportion remain childless; however, after starting childbearing they have a higher propensity than foreign women to have a second and third child. Naturalisation and fertility are interlinked; women with children are more likely to naturalise than those without, which then boosts the average fertility of the Swiss population. \nWe confirm that the standard TFR gives an inflated impression of the ultimate (cohort) fertility of foreign nationals and under-estimates that of Swiss women, and we describe how this happens. Fundamentally, the TFR is a measure of childbearing intensity, not an accurate estimate of completed cohort fertility, especially for a mobile population.","PeriodicalId":44592,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Population Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Population Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12765/cpos-2020-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since 1971 the Swiss Federal Statistical Office has published annual fertility data split by nationality (Swiss/foreign). These indicate that the TFR for women of foreign nationality has been 0.5 children higher than for Swiss women for most of the period since 1991. However, statistics from household registration (STATPOP) and the Families and Generations Surveys (FGS) in 2013 and 2018 indicate that foreign women, approaching the end of their reproductive lives, have slightly smaller families than women of Swiss nationality. The purpose of this paper is to reconcile these contradictory fertility measures. To do this, we design a novel methodology for tallying the fertility of cohorts of Swiss and foreign nationals through their reproductive life. In addition to birth registrations and population totals by age (the input data for calculating the TFR) we also include estimates of how many children women have at the time of their immigration, emigration and naturalisation. Using these input data, we compile the fertility profiles of Swiss and foreign women aged 15-49 (cohorts 1966-2003). These correspond well with the FGS and household register data. Several processes impact the final fertility of the two sub-populations. Women frequently immigrate into Switzerland in their 20s. Often arriving childless, they commonly start childbearing soon after immigration. However, there is still a flow of low-fertility women into the country in their 30s and 40s, lowering the average fertility of the foreign population. By contrast, Swiss women start childbearing later and a significant proportion remain childless; however, after starting childbearing they have a higher propensity than foreign women to have a second and third child. Naturalisation and fertility are interlinked; women with children are more likely to naturalise than those without, which then boosts the average fertility of the Swiss population. We confirm that the standard TFR gives an inflated impression of the ultimate (cohort) fertility of foreign nationals and under-estimates that of Swiss women, and we describe how this happens. Fundamentally, the TFR is a measure of childbearing intensity, not an accurate estimate of completed cohort fertility, especially for a mobile population.
为什么标准TFR对外国妇女的生育能力有误导性的印象:来自瑞士的见解
自1971年以来,瑞士联邦统计局公布了按国籍(瑞士/外国)划分的年度生育率数据。这些数据表明,在1991年以来的大部分时间里,外国国籍妇女的TFR比瑞士妇女高0.5个孩子。然而,2013年和2018年的户籍和家庭与代际调查统计数据表明,即将结束生育生活的外国妇女的家庭规模略小于瑞士籍妇女。本文的目的是调和这些相互矛盾的生育率指标。为了做到这一点,我们设计了一种新的方法来统计瑞士和外国国民在其生殖生活中的生育率。除了出生登记和按年龄划分的人口总数(计算TFR的输入数据)外,我们还包括对妇女在移民、移民和入籍时有多少孩子的估计。利用这些输入数据,我们汇编了瑞士和外国15-49岁女性(1966-2003年)的生育率概况。这些数据与FGS和户籍数据非常吻合。几个过程影响这两个亚种群的最终生育能力。女性经常在20多岁时移民到瑞士。他们通常在移民后不久就开始生育。然而,仍有30多岁和40多岁的低生育率女性流入该国,降低了外国人口的平均生育率。相比之下,瑞士妇女开始生育的时间较晚,而且很大一部分妇女仍然没有孩子;然而,在开始生育后,她们比外国女性更倾向于生第二个和第三个孩子。归化和生育是相互关联的;有孩子的女性比没有孩子的女性更有可能入籍,这提高了瑞士人口的平均生育率。我们证实,标准TFR对外国国民的最终(队列)生育率给出了夸大的印象,而对瑞士妇女的最终(群体)生育率的估计不足,我们描述了这种情况是如何发生的。从根本上说,TFR是衡量生育强度的指标,而不是对完整队列生育率的准确估计,尤其是对流动人口而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信