Monte Carlo evaluation of target dose coverage in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with flattening filter-free beams.

IF 0.3 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-16 DOI:10.1017/s1460396920000886
Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan
{"title":"Monte Carlo evaluation of target dose coverage in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with flattening filter-free beams.","authors":"Oleg N Vassiliev, Christine B Peterson, Joe Y Chang, Radhe Mohan","doi":"10.1017/s1460396920000886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Previous studies showed that replacing conventional flattened beams (FF) with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams improves the therapeutic ratio in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), but these findings could have been impacted by dose calculation uncertainties caused by the heterogeneity of the thoracic anatomy and by respiratory motion, which were particularly high for target coverage. In this study, we minimized such uncertainties by calculating doses using high-spatial-resolution Monte Carlo and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images. We aimed to evaluate more reliably the benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For a cohort of 15 patients with early stage lung cancer that we investigated in a previous treatment planning study, we recalculated dose distributions with Monte Carlo using 4DCT images. This included fifteen FF and fifteen FFF treatment plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to Monte Carlo, the treatment planning system (TPS) over-predicted doses in low-dose regions of the planning target volume. For most patients, replacing FF beams with FFF beams improved target coverage, tumor control, and uncomplicated tumor control probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Monte Carlo tends to reveal deficiencies in target coverage compared to coverage predicted by the TPS. Our data support previously reported benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":44597,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1460396920000886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies showed that replacing conventional flattened beams (FF) with flattening filter-free (FFF) beams improves the therapeutic ratio in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), but these findings could have been impacted by dose calculation uncertainties caused by the heterogeneity of the thoracic anatomy and by respiratory motion, which were particularly high for target coverage. In this study, we minimized such uncertainties by calculating doses using high-spatial-resolution Monte Carlo and four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) images. We aimed to evaluate more reliably the benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.

Materials and methods: For a cohort of 15 patients with early stage lung cancer that we investigated in a previous treatment planning study, we recalculated dose distributions with Monte Carlo using 4DCT images. This included fifteen FF and fifteen FFF treatment plans.

Results: Compared to Monte Carlo, the treatment planning system (TPS) over-predicted doses in low-dose regions of the planning target volume. For most patients, replacing FF beams with FFF beams improved target coverage, tumor control, and uncomplicated tumor control probabilities.

Conclusions: Monte Carlo tends to reveal deficiencies in target coverage compared to coverage predicted by the TPS. Our data support previously reported benefits of using FFF beams for lung SBRT.

无滤波光束平坦化肺立体定向放射治疗靶剂量覆盖率的蒙特卡罗评价
【摘要】目的:以往的研究表明,在肺立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)中,用无滤光片(FFF)的平坦束(FF)代替传统的平坦束(FF)可提高治疗率,但这些结果可能受到胸腔解剖结构异质性和呼吸运动(靶覆盖率特别高)引起的剂量计算不确定性的影响。在这项研究中,我们通过使用高空间分辨率蒙特卡罗和四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)图像计算剂量来最小化这种不确定性。我们的目的是更可靠地评估使用FFF束进行肺部SBRT的益处。材料和方法:对于我们在之前的治疗计划研究中调查的15例早期肺癌患者,我们使用4DCT图像使用蒙特卡罗重新计算剂量分布。其中包括15个FF和15个FFF治疗方案。结果:与蒙特卡罗相比,治疗计划系统(TPS)在计划靶体积(PTV)的低剂量区域高估了剂量。对于大多数患者,用FFF波束代替FF波束改善了目标覆盖、肿瘤控制和简单的肿瘤控制概率。结论:与TPS预测的覆盖率相比,蒙特卡罗倾向于揭示目标覆盖率的不足。我们的数据支持先前报道的使用FFF光束进行肺部SBRT的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice
Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiotherapy in Practice is a peer-reviewed journal covering all of the current modalities specific to clinical oncology and radiotherapy. The journal aims to publish research from a wide range of styles and encourage debate and the exchange of information and opinion from within the field of radiotherapy practice and clinical oncology. The journal also aims to encourage technical evaluations and case studies as well as equipment reviews that will be of interest to an international radiotherapy audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信