One Stone, Two Birds: Can China Leverage WTO Accession to Build the BRI?

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 Q3 ECONOMICS
J. Chaisse, Jamieson Kirkwood
{"title":"One Stone, Two Birds: Can China Leverage WTO Accession to Build the BRI?","authors":"J. Chaisse, Jamieson Kirkwood","doi":"10.54648/trad2021011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The efficacy of the World Trade Organization (WTO), as an international forum seeking to provide a uniform platform to Member States for bilateral and multilateral negotiations and further the spirit of a new international economic legal order, is challenged constantly. This article explains how China is using the WTO accession process to leverage its domestic interests towards the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) to obtain greater commitments from existing and potential BRI nations. It is shown that after the BRI’s official establishment in 2013, China’s trade commitments from potential accession countries are becoming more pronounced, with increasing and sometimes onerous expectations of the acceding countries, due to the lack of any standard format for bilateral accession protocols. WTO law is increasingly part of BRI hard law governance practices, suggesting encroachment of BRI disputes within the WTO dispute settlement framework to establish a novel approach to dispute resolution. Since rules-based trade practices are needed, Member States should not adopt accession protocols that are either too rigid or too flexible, thereby creating glaring loopholes to be misused. WTO’s overall objective of furthering trade liberalization can be achieved only by keeping track of techniques adopted by developed countries when negotiating with developing and least developed countries such that potential members are not discouraged from joining the new economic order from the outset.\nBRI, Belt and Road Initiative, WTO, accession, SCM agreement, subsidies, services, telecommunications, trade-related investment measures, LDC Guidelines","PeriodicalId":46019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Trade","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Trade","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2021011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The efficacy of the World Trade Organization (WTO), as an international forum seeking to provide a uniform platform to Member States for bilateral and multilateral negotiations and further the spirit of a new international economic legal order, is challenged constantly. This article explains how China is using the WTO accession process to leverage its domestic interests towards the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) to obtain greater commitments from existing and potential BRI nations. It is shown that after the BRI’s official establishment in 2013, China’s trade commitments from potential accession countries are becoming more pronounced, with increasing and sometimes onerous expectations of the acceding countries, due to the lack of any standard format for bilateral accession protocols. WTO law is increasingly part of BRI hard law governance practices, suggesting encroachment of BRI disputes within the WTO dispute settlement framework to establish a novel approach to dispute resolution. Since rules-based trade practices are needed, Member States should not adopt accession protocols that are either too rigid or too flexible, thereby creating glaring loopholes to be misused. WTO’s overall objective of furthering trade liberalization can be achieved only by keeping track of techniques adopted by developed countries when negotiating with developing and least developed countries such that potential members are not discouraged from joining the new economic order from the outset. BRI, Belt and Road Initiative, WTO, accession, SCM agreement, subsidies, services, telecommunications, trade-related investment measures, LDC Guidelines
一石二鸟:中国能否利用加入WTO构建“一带一路”倡议?
世界贸易组织(世贸组织)作为一个国际论坛,寻求为成员国提供一个统一的双边和多边谈判平台,并促进新的国际经济法律秩序的精神,其效力不断受到挑战。本文解释了中国如何利用加入世贸组织的过程,利用其国内利益来推动“一带一路”倡议,以获得现有和潜在“一带一路上”国家的更大承诺。研究表明,2013年“一带一路”倡议正式确立后,由于双边加入议定书缺乏任何标准格式,中国对潜在加入国的贸易承诺越来越明显,对加入国的期望越来越高,有时甚至很苛刻。世贸组织法律越来越多地成为“一带一路”硬法治理实践的一部分,这表明在世贸组织争端解决框架内侵犯“一带一路上”争端,以建立一种新的争端解决方法。由于需要基于规则的贸易做法,会员国不应通过过于僵化或过于灵活的加入议定书,从而造成明显的漏洞,供滥用。只有跟踪发达国家在与发展中国家和最不发达国家谈判时采用的技术,才能实现世贸组织促进贸易自由化的总体目标,从而使潜在成员从一开始就不被劝阻加入新的经济秩序。“一带一路”倡议、“一带一路”倡议倡议、世贸组织、加入、供应链管理协议、补贴、服务、电信、与贸易有关的投资措施、最不发达国家指南
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Far and away the most thought-provoking and informative journal in its field, the Journal of World Trade sets the agenda for both scholarship and policy initiatives in this most critical area of international relations. It is the only journal which deals authoritatively with the most crucial issues affecting world trade today.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信