Terrestrial protected areas do not fully shield their streams from exogenous stressors

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Victor Hugo dos Santos Mollmann, S. Santos, G. Fernandes, E. C. Mossolin, Marcelo M. Dalosto, S. Cardoso, O. Prestes, R. Zanella, M. L. Bartholomei-Santos
{"title":"Terrestrial protected areas do not fully shield their streams from exogenous stressors","authors":"Victor Hugo dos Santos Mollmann, S. Santos, G. Fernandes, E. C. Mossolin, Marcelo M. Dalosto, S. Cardoso, O. Prestes, R. Zanella, M. L. Bartholomei-Santos","doi":"10.1017/S0376892922000261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary Protected areas (PAs) represent a powerful refuge for maintaining and safeguarding biodiversity. Generally, PAs are delineated to protect terrestrial taxa, providing incidental protection to the aquatic ecosystems within their borders. Here, we compare water quality within PAs and non-PAs in southern Brazil, encompassing remnants of the Atlantic Forest biome, to assess whether PAs serve as a buffer from external pressures for aquatic ecosystems within their boundaries. In addition to physicochemical and microbiological water parameters, we analysed 147 pesticide and 31 pharmaceutical compounds in water samples from 33 sites within and outside PAs. The water quality did not differ between PAs and non-PAs but indicated clear pollution from sewage discharges. We found 19 pesticides and five pharmaceuticals in streams within the study area. We detected pesticides in all sampling sites, with the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid present in 91% of them. Our data show that PAs are insufficient means to mitigate the impacts stemming from their catchments, and the running water that reaches their domains already shows signs of anthropogenic interference, which may affect aquatic biodiversity. Protection and management measures require consideration of the whole watershed to protect freshwater habitats and biota.","PeriodicalId":50517,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Conservation","volume":"49 1","pages":"215 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892922000261","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary Protected areas (PAs) represent a powerful refuge for maintaining and safeguarding biodiversity. Generally, PAs are delineated to protect terrestrial taxa, providing incidental protection to the aquatic ecosystems within their borders. Here, we compare water quality within PAs and non-PAs in southern Brazil, encompassing remnants of the Atlantic Forest biome, to assess whether PAs serve as a buffer from external pressures for aquatic ecosystems within their boundaries. In addition to physicochemical and microbiological water parameters, we analysed 147 pesticide and 31 pharmaceutical compounds in water samples from 33 sites within and outside PAs. The water quality did not differ between PAs and non-PAs but indicated clear pollution from sewage discharges. We found 19 pesticides and five pharmaceuticals in streams within the study area. We detected pesticides in all sampling sites, with the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid present in 91% of them. Our data show that PAs are insufficient means to mitigate the impacts stemming from their catchments, and the running water that reaches their domains already shows signs of anthropogenic interference, which may affect aquatic biodiversity. Protection and management measures require consideration of the whole watershed to protect freshwater habitats and biota.
陆地保护区并不能完全保护其河流免受外源压力的影响
保护区是维持和保护生物多样性的有力避难所。一般来说,保护区的划定是为了保护陆地分类群,对其边界内的水生生态系统提供附带保护。在这里,我们比较了巴西南部保护区和非保护区的水质,包括大西洋森林生物群系的残余,以评估保护区是否可以缓冲其边界内水生生态系统的外部压力。除了物理化学和微生物水参数外,我们还分析了来自pa内外33个地点的水样中的147种农药和31种药物化合物。水质在保护区和非保护区之间没有差异,但表明污水排放的污染明显。我们在研究区域的河流中发现了19种农药和5种药物。我们在所有采样点检测到农药,其中91%的采样点含有除草剂2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸。我们的数据表明,保护区不足以减轻其集水区的影响,并且到达其域的流水已经显示出可能影响水生生物多样性的人为干扰迹象。保护和管理措施需要考虑整个流域,以保护淡水生境和生物区系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Conservation
Environmental Conservation 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Environmental Conservation is one of the longest-standing, most highly-cited of the interdisciplinary environmental science journals. It includes research papers, reports, comments, subject reviews, and book reviews addressing environmental policy, practice, and natural and social science of environmental concern at the global level, informed by rigorous local level case studies. The journal"s scope is very broad, including issues in human institutions, ecosystem change, resource utilisation, terrestrial biomes, aquatic systems, and coastal and land use management. Environmental Conservation is essential reading for all environmentalists, managers, consultants, agency workers and scientists wishing to keep abreast of current developments in environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信