Age-related variation in lifestyle and its relationship to chronic disease as shown by a survey using a self-evaluation questionnaire

YogaMimamsa Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ym.ym_10_23
Sonika Thakral, Rahul Garg, Ramesh J. Bijlani
{"title":"Age-related variation in lifestyle and its relationship to chronic disease as shown by a survey using a self-evaluation questionnaire","authors":"Sonika Thakral, Rahul Garg, Ramesh J. Bijlani","doi":"10.4103/ym.ym_10_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Many of the prevalent diseases have their roots in inappropriate lifestyle besides heredity. Modifiable lifestyle factors may be effective in the prevention and management of such diseases, as indicated by several research studies. This cross-sectional survey explores the correlation between various lifestyle factors and some common diseases primarily in the Indian context. Materials and Methods: A lifestyle questionnaire having 40 questions and comprising 7 dimensions was administered as a Google Form. The subjects of the study, recruited using convenience sampling, were all above 17 years of age. Results: The subjects were divided into four age groups. The lifestyle score (LS) increased with age, with the maximum rise happening in the age group 31–40. For the age groups 31–40 and 41–60, significant differences were found in the LSs of those having a lifestyle disease and those having none; two out of seven dimensions could predict the presence of a lifestyle disease for these groups. A dimension-wise comparison between Indian and outside India subjects within age groups revealed that Indians scored better in most cases where there was a significant difference. A similar comparison between males and females showed that females scored better in all cases of significant difference. However, females had a significantly more incidence of lifestyle diseases. Conclusions: The impact of a low LS starts becoming visible in the age group 31–40. Furthermore, this group makes maximum efforts to improve lifestyle. Hence, it is likely to be benefited the most by health education. Since females appear to be more prone, they need special focus.","PeriodicalId":55843,"journal":{"name":"YogaMimamsa","volume":"55 1","pages":"12 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YogaMimamsa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ym.ym_10_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many of the prevalent diseases have their roots in inappropriate lifestyle besides heredity. Modifiable lifestyle factors may be effective in the prevention and management of such diseases, as indicated by several research studies. This cross-sectional survey explores the correlation between various lifestyle factors and some common diseases primarily in the Indian context. Materials and Methods: A lifestyle questionnaire having 40 questions and comprising 7 dimensions was administered as a Google Form. The subjects of the study, recruited using convenience sampling, were all above 17 years of age. Results: The subjects were divided into four age groups. The lifestyle score (LS) increased with age, with the maximum rise happening in the age group 31–40. For the age groups 31–40 and 41–60, significant differences were found in the LSs of those having a lifestyle disease and those having none; two out of seven dimensions could predict the presence of a lifestyle disease for these groups. A dimension-wise comparison between Indian and outside India subjects within age groups revealed that Indians scored better in most cases where there was a significant difference. A similar comparison between males and females showed that females scored better in all cases of significant difference. However, females had a significantly more incidence of lifestyle diseases. Conclusions: The impact of a low LS starts becoming visible in the age group 31–40. Furthermore, this group makes maximum efforts to improve lifestyle. Hence, it is likely to be benefited the most by health education. Since females appear to be more prone, they need special focus.
一项使用自我评价问卷的调查显示,年龄相关的生活方式差异及其与慢性病的关系
背景:许多流行疾病除遗传因素外,还与生活方式不当有关。一些研究表明,可改变的生活方式因素可能对预防和控制这些疾病有效。这个横断面调查探讨了各种生活方式因素和一些常见疾病之间的相关性,主要是在印度的背景下。材料与方法:采用生活方式问卷,共7个维度,共40个问题。该研究采用方便抽样的方法招募了17岁以上的研究对象。结果:受试者分为4个年龄组。生活方式得分(LS)随年龄增长而增加,其中31-40岁年龄组的上升幅度最大。在31-40岁和41-60岁年龄组中,有生活方式疾病者和无生活方式疾病者的LSs有显著差异;七个维度中的两个可以预测这些群体是否存在生活方式疾病。一项对印度人和非印度人在不同年龄段的测试对象进行的维度比较显示,印度人在大多数情况下得分更高,这是有显著差异的。在男性和女性之间进行的类似比较表明,女性在所有情况下得分更高,差异显著。然而,女性的生活方式疾病发病率明显更高。结论:低LS的影响在31-40岁年龄组开始变得明显。此外,这一群体尽最大努力改善生活方式。因此,它很可能是健康教育的最大受益者。由于女性似乎更容易发生这种情况,所以她们需要特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信