In Dubio Pro Tributario/In Dubio Mitius as a Rule of Reasoning in Tax Law Interpretation

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW
Intertax Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2023041
W. Morawski, R. Boháč
{"title":"In Dubio Pro Tributario/In Dubio Mitius as a Rule of Reasoning in Tax Law Interpretation","authors":"W. Morawski, R. Boháč","doi":"10.54648/taxi2023041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The is devoted to the principle of in dubio pro tributario (the principle of resolving doubts in favour of the taxpayer) as a rule of legal reasoning. The article points out its following two aspects: (1) the evidential aspect whereby it is concerned with resolving uncertainties regarding the proof of facts that are relevant to the determination of the amount of tax and (2) the interpretative aspect whereby it is used to resolve doubts related to the ambiguity of a legal regulation. The article focuses on the second aspect. The authors present how various legal systems have developed different ways of understanding this principle. They point out that it is not a universally applied principle in tax law and that it has been rejected in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).\ninterpretation, in dubio pro tributario, in dubio mitius, tax law, tax avoidance, EU law","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2023041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The is devoted to the principle of in dubio pro tributario (the principle of resolving doubts in favour of the taxpayer) as a rule of legal reasoning. The article points out its following two aspects: (1) the evidential aspect whereby it is concerned with resolving uncertainties regarding the proof of facts that are relevant to the determination of the amount of tax and (2) the interpretative aspect whereby it is used to resolve doubts related to the ambiguity of a legal regulation. The article focuses on the second aspect. The authors present how various legal systems have developed different ways of understanding this principle. They point out that it is not a universally applied principle in tax law and that it has been rejected in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). interpretation, in dubio pro tributario, in dubio mitius, tax law, tax avoidance, EU law
论税收法律解释中的疑罪自罚/疑罪自罚的推理规则
它致力于将in dubio pro tributario原则(有利于纳税人解决疑问的原则)作为法律推理的规则。该条款指出了其以下两个方面:(1)证据方面,即它涉及解决与确定税额有关的事实证明方面的不确定性;(2)解释方面,即它用于解决与法律规定的模糊性有关的疑问。本文的重点是第二个方面。作者介绍了不同的法律体系如何发展出理解这一原则的不同方式。他们指出,这不是一项普遍适用的税法原则,在欧盟法院(CJEU)的判例法中,解释,在可疑性,在可疑性,税法,避税,欧盟法中都被拒绝了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信