Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness

IF 1.2 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Muhammed Khaise, S. De Barros, N. Rohem, M. Banea, S. Budhe
{"title":"Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness","authors":"Muhammed Khaise, S. De Barros, N. Rohem, M. Banea, S. Budhe","doi":"10.3221/igf-esis.63.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code with constitutive models for metallic steel and composite material to failure modelling was used. Three different cases: non-defective pipe, wall loss defective pipe and composite repaired of defective pipe are considered. It was found that the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical results in all the three cases. The theoretical failure pressure determined by ISO/TS 24817 standard for wall loss defect pipe is highly conservative compared to the numerical failure pressure for the given composite repair thickness. Additionally, the numerical study on optimization of repair thickness revealed that lower composite repair thickness can also sustain the designed failure pressure (composite repair thickness of 8.4 mm can sustain the same designed pressure instead of 16.1 mm thickness), which implies there is scope to further reduce the composite thickness, which ultimately reduce the repair cost.","PeriodicalId":38546,"journal":{"name":"Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3221/igf-esis.63.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code with constitutive models for metallic steel and composite material to failure modelling was used. Three different cases: non-defective pipe, wall loss defective pipe and composite repaired of defective pipe are considered. It was found that the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical results in all the three cases. The theoretical failure pressure determined by ISO/TS 24817 standard for wall loss defect pipe is highly conservative compared to the numerical failure pressure for the given composite repair thickness. Additionally, the numerical study on optimization of repair thickness revealed that lower composite repair thickness can also sustain the designed failure pressure (composite repair thickness of 8.4 mm can sustain the same designed pressure instead of 16.1 mm thickness), which implies there is scope to further reduce the composite thickness, which ultimately reduce the repair cost.
修复壁损缺陷管道复合材料最佳包层厚度的数值分析
本文对壁损缺陷金属管道的失效压力进行了数值分析,并与实验结果进行了验证。利用数值分析方法,对修复壁损缺陷管道的复合材料厚度进行了优化。采用具有本构模型的非线性显式有限元程序对金属钢和复合材料进行了失效模拟。考虑了三种不同的情况:无缺陷管、壁损缺陷管和缺陷管的复合修复。结果表明,三种情况下的数值计算结果与解析计算结果吻合较好。根据ISO/TS 24817标准确定的壁损缺陷管道的理论破坏压力与给定复合修复厚度下的数值破坏压力相比是高度保守的。此外,对修复厚度优化的数值研究表明,较低的复合材料修复厚度也可以承受设计的失效压力(复合材料修复厚度8.4 mm可以承受相同的设计压力,而复合材料修复厚度16.1 mm可以承受相同的设计压力),这意味着复合材料厚度还有进一步减小的空间,从而最终降低修复成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale
Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信